Path: csiph.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsgate.cuhk.edu.hk!news.netfront.net!.POSTED.108.219.229.47!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy Subject: Re: meteorite-used-as-doorstop-on-michigan-farm-for-decades Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 15:22:29 -0700 Organization: Netfront http://www.netfront.net/ Message-ID: <5BC11EA5.6DB@ix.netcom.com> References: <5BB8EDD4.501A@ix.netcom.com> <5BB8FB1B.5B0D@ix.netcom.com> <5BB903F7.139B@ix.netcom.com> <5BBA4D72.6ED4@ix.netcom.com> <5BBA507E.4447@ix.netcom.com> <5BBA62E5.4EC9@ix.netcom.com> <5BBC57D3.6D82@ix.netcom.com> <5BBCED83.32A7@ix.netcom.com> <451e6a2a-1383-43df-a97e-5d2f88e953e5@googlegroups.com> <5BBD49D1.7A15@ix.netcom.com> <5BBF8BC1.4935@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: adenine.netfront.net; posting-host="108.219.229.47"; logging-data="95077"; mail-complaints-to="news@netfront.net" X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 181012-8, 10/12/2018), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Xref: csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:500314 sci.physics:707533 sci.physics.relativity:474791 alt.astronomy:301791 The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Herbert Glazier wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 11:03:51 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://fox17online.com/2018/10/04/100000-meteorite-used-as-doorstop-on-michigan-farm-for-decades/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if the rock is big enough...you can use it for a planet! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How much for the rock I'm walking on? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > They should send a rover to earth and find out the origin of the universe... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's rock it science, isn't it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A German-French Hopping Robot Just Landed on the Surface of Asteroid Ryugu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MASCOT, the French-German hopping robot that's part of the Hayabusa2 mission, successfully landed on the asteroid Ryugu, and completed its brief mission. > > > > > > > > > > Universe Today > > > > > > > > > > today > > > > > > > > > > These Photos of Asteroid Ryugu from the Successful MASCOT Landing Are Amazing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Before the MASCOT lander spent 17 hours studying the asteroid Ryugu, the spacecraft captured some incredible photographs. > > > > > > > > > > Space.com > > > > > > > > > > yesterday > > > > > > > > > > MASCOT lander sends back otherworldly views of asteroid Ryugu’s rugged terrain > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Japan's Hayabusa 2 probe and the German-French MASCOT lander have teamed up to send back amazing views of an asteroid that's more than 180 million ... > > > > > > > > > > GeekWire > > > > > > > > > > today > > > > > > > > > > This toaster-sized asteroid rover accomplished more in 17 hours than you will in your life > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Even a mayfly gets about 24 hours to live before its body runs out of fuel and shuts down. MASCOT, a decidedly dead asteroid-landing robot, got just 17 hours of ... > > > > > > > > > > Popular Science > > > > > > > > > > today > > > > > > > > > > MASCOT 2.0? Mars Moon Rover to Fly on Japanese Mission to Phobos in 2024 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The hopping asteroid lander MASCOT may be dead, but its bloodline will live on — and get to explore the Mars system a few years from now. A rover will be ... > > > > > > > > > > Space.com > > > > > > > > > > yesterday > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If landing a rover on earth (just a big rock in space) cannot explain the origin of the universe, what can an asteroid tell you? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dumb, dumb, dumb...these little men in their white suits are. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In other words, 'rocks' is just a byproduct of the universe. Rocks are not the universe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stupid, stupid, stupid...these little men in their white suits are. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, if 'I' was to land a rover on Earth, ...what would 'I' find? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would find a ball just like the others...except, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the surface contains...chemicals. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All of it...just chemicals. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > maybe a few rocks here and there... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but...just mostly...chemicals > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > moving around the surface. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is nothing else 'I' can find. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Or as Richard Feynman would mumble...'... from the ground: some minerals > > > > > > > and so forth.' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mostly chemicals..., rocks on the ground, some minerals and so forth. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now class, you might ask the question..."How was the Empire State Building formed?" > > > > > > > > > > > > The answer is simple...Chemicals. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mostly chemicals..., rocks on the ground, some minerals and so forth. > > > > > > > > > > > > The same way Mountains are formed on Earth. > > > > > > > > > > you call the chemical that makes mountains...lava. > > > > > > > > > > besides the...rocks on the ground, some minerals and so forth, ... What you call a tree is just a ...chemical. > > > > > > > > > > A tree is just a chemical on the surface of the earth. A tree is one hundred percent a chemical. > > > > > > > > > > (you're not suppose to know this stuff) (they don't want you to know) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i tink yous people are a little too close to the trees to see a tree is just a chemical on the surface of the earth. > > > > > > Is carbon a chemical?Its an element.Burn a tree and it ends in elements.Thus its in reality atoms that make elements possible.Bert > > > > Here's a simple math... > > > > if 50 percent of a tree is a chemical > > and 50 percent of a tree is carbon (carbon is a chemical) > > > > then how much of the tree is a chemical? > > > > 50 percent plus 50 percent = 100 percent chemical. > > > > A tree is one hundred percent a chemical. > > > > If a chemical can make a mountain..then certaintly all it takes is chemicals to build the Empire State building. > > > > Now, for the hard part...the tough questions, ... > > > > What do you call the chemical that build the Empire State Building? > > On the surface of the earth are chemicals moving about the earth that no only are smart enough to > build mountains...but can build the Empire State Building. This chemical that builds building is > called the human body. > > This chemical that moves around the surface of the earth...searching for food and so forth..gets it's ...abilities > from...the sun. > > In other words, it's is the 'force' of the sun that drives the chemicals on the surface of the earth. > > It is the sun that makes the chemicals, and drives it around the surface of the earth. > > So, what you have is just a bunch of chemicals on the surface of the earth...(some with big egos). Of course the ocean appears to be the most chemical scum on the surface of the earth...