Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Artificial Intelligence will have a positive impact on jobs in scientific and technical services in UK: PwC Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:51:55 -0700 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 68 Message-ID: <5B50EBDB.2854@ix.netcom.com> References: <5B4F9608.3A96@ix.netcom.com> <794abad2-1c84-4681-b60b-a3d2953a331c@googlegroups.com> <5B50C719.302A@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com NNTP-Posting-Host: X9ItFNC7Zcz4l6MobL/YRA.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3 X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 180719-6, 07/19/2018), Outbound message Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:694663 sci.physics.relativity:464954 alal65536@gmail.com wrote: > > On Thursday, July 19, 2018 at 10:45:10 PM UTC+5:30, The Starmaker wrote: > > alal65536@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > On Thursday, July 19, 2018 at 1:03:21 AM UTC+5:30, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > alal65536@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Between 2017 to 2037, net 200,000 jobs will be created due to AI. Number of jobs in health will go up by 22% and in scientific and technical services by 16%. These are the two biggest winners. The biggest loser is manufacturing, down by 25%. > > > > > > > > > > These are approximate numbers. Those who have digital skills and are creative stand to benefit the most from the AI revolution. > > > > > > > > > > Abhinav Lal > > > > > > > > > > > > if you know anthing about...Artificial Intelligence (as i do cause i'm an expert on the subject) you'll > > > > discover that it's ...artifical. > > > > > > > > > > I know something about AI, because when I was about 16 I read a book on AI, and used that knowledge to write an AI program. > > > > > > > > > > > > > well then, reading a book on ai makes you an expert on it, doesn't it? > > > > > > the way it works > > if you read one book > > on relativity > > you're an expert on it. > > I said, "I know something about AI", which is something very different from claiming to be an expert. You are the one who claims to be an expert. You have failed to substantiate your claims about AI, that it is fake or phony. Instead of discussing the subject, and arguing the topic, you make misleading statements about me. > > If you are an expert, please stay on topic, and explain how successful expert systems and other algorithms are fake. > > Abhinav Lal You misunderstood me.. I asked a question: well then, reading a book on ai makes you an expert on it, doesn't it? The answer is either Yes or No. Then I wrote: the way it works if you read one book on relativity you're an expert on it. Meaning...there are a lot of people in the 'scientific community' who read 'one' book on physics and consider themselves...experts. Unless of course they went to ...Relativity School. I mean, what determines a person to be called a ...Scientist? Or call themselves a scientist?? Answer of course is just ...read one book on science. I mean, you said you read one book, wrote a ai program... you could've have sold it too if you wanted to. Consider yourself an expert.