Path: csiph.com!3.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:18:50 -0500 Message-ID: <5AAFE2E9.26C8@ix.netcom.com> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 09:18:49 -0700 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy Subject: Re: The Steady State Universe References: <5AA96C99.616D@ix.netcom.com> <5AA9CB55.499C@ix.netcom.com> <5AA9FB94.77CA@ix.netcom.com> <5AAEC75F.C7E@ix.netcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 180319-0, 03/19/2018), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Lines: 122 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47 X-Trace: sv3-lwzpyA8vvX0OvmOWyazBer2wo+wkOPVbuAXbQ152dIzHrWJfl6MwKAfn3aoGtHT7gRQ29AtPHfrVY7t!0c6mHcu4Xp1cxHrhqPCr4AHoLRXiWH9fn+bpW6JGEgovDFdiHsdNBiK+ax9/ejz7qm+jDZkeXu4u!2992Tj6uMEw= X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 5586 Xref: csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:488704 sci.physics:677196 sci.physics.relativity:453254 alt.astronomy:297555 J. Clarke wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:03:22 +1100, Daniel60 > wrote: > > >The Starmaker wrote on 19/03/18 07:09: > >> The Starmaker wrote: > >>> > >>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>> > >>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Before the Big Bang occurred.. > >>>>> > >>>>> the universe was a Steady State Universe. > >>>>> > >>>>> Simply put, it became unsteady. > >>>>> > >>>>> So, if you want to know what caused the Big Bang.. > >>>>> > >>>>> it was simply the end of a Steady State Universe. > >>>>> > >>>>> Not the end of a theory for a new theory... > >>>>> > >>>>> but the end of a universe for a new universe. > >>>>> > >>>>> Based on observations.. > >>>>> > >>>>> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > >>>>> > >>>>> oh, btw...i found the Blue. > >>>>> > >>>>> but yous guys (including albert einstein) made a big mistake of dropping one theory for another theory, > >>>>> > >>>>> when they both were correct. > >>>>> > >>>>> Where do you guys learn physics from???? > >>>> > >>>> Besides this, the green area of the photograph is what is illustrated below: > >>>> > >>>> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > >>>> > >>>> Here is an illustration of what caused the big bang... > >>>> > >>>> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d2/Olber%27s_Paradox_-_All_Points.gif > >>>> > >>>> Except, you guys got the paradox.... backwards. > >>>> > >>>> Where do you guys learn physics from???? > >>> > >>> For example...according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olbers%27_paradox > >>> > >>> " In the hypothetical case that the universe is static, homogeneous at a large scale, and > >>> populated by an infinite number of stars, then > >>> any line of sight from Earth must end at the (very bright) surface of a star and > >>> hence the night sky should be completely illuminated and very bright. > >>> This contradicts the observed darkness and non-uniformity of the night." > >>> > >>> They got this Olber thing (including Olber) ...backwards. > >>> > >>> The green area here that is... > >>> > >>> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > >>> > >>> "populated by an infinite number of stars" > >>> > >>> any line of sight from Earth must BEGIN at the (very bright) surface of a star > >>> > >>> (which is the red area you see here) > >>> > >>> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > >>> > >>> that which you call the big bang is "the (very bright) surface of a star". > >>> > >>> Not "must end at the (very bright) surface of a star", but must BEGIN at the (very bright) surface of a star. > >>> > >>> Where do you guys learn physics from???? Who gets all this stuff ...backwards? > >> > >> > >> Now, here is an 'illustration' of what 'the before and after big bang photo' looks like...sideways: > >> http://journalofcosmology.com/images/WormHoleDiminsions66.jpg > >> > >> > >> A is the steady state universe and B is the present big bang. > >> > >> > >> It's this photo, but sideways illustrated. > >> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > >> > >> > >> The green is A and the B is red. > >> > >> > >> > >> and this is the illustration of what happened moments before A transformed to B > >> > >> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d2/Olber%27s_Paradox_-_All_Points.gif > >> > >> > >> > >> just looking for more space: > >> http://journalofcosmology.com/images/WormHoleDiminsions66.jpg > >> > >> > >> > >> Actually...if you believe the universe is ...flat, then picture a flat...cone. > >> > >> > >> > >> Where do you guys learn physics from???? > >> > >> > >> from stupid proffesors?? oh, go back to skool, you're gonna learn a lot more, ain't you? > >> > >Looking at those links ... it's easy to see that you have *NEVER* > >learned any physics!! > > If you are going to continue to play with Starmaker, please let the > rest of us know so we can killfile you. You're one of those 'do as i say, not as i do' people...