Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:17:13 -0500 Message-ID: <5AAFE288.4408@ix.netcom.com> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 09:17:12 -0700 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy Subject: Re: The Steady State Universe References: <5AA96C99.616D@ix.netcom.com> <5AA9CB55.499C@ix.netcom.com> <5AA9FB94.77CA@ix.netcom.com> <5AAEC75F.C7E@ix.netcom.com> <5AAF4EA5.53C2@ix.netcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 180319-0, 03/19/2018), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Lines: 130 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47 X-Trace: sv3-2qh7S5OE/ylnydhKHJYy/n8w9h6Nmf0z86FUIoTO3xFfyAfSdLZyKad0ZaBzi+ydaunJDGkd2JvTVOG!rrQ4DjS6vNPnvv+exGamovabpGmLz9oHOZvh4OdTk2y/ws5dk9xk/CgLnCJy2ibHbc32oHTgp89N!bg1Ze9roMU0= X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 5910 Xref: csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:488703 sci.physics:677195 sci.physics.relativity:453253 alt.astronomy:297554 Daniel60 wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote on 19/03/18 16:46: > > Daniel60 wrote: > >> > >> The Starmaker wrote on 19/03/18 07:09: > >>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>> > >>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Before the Big Bang occurred.. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> the universe was a Steady State Universe. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Simply put, it became unsteady. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> So, if you want to know what caused the Big Bang.. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> it was simply the end of a Steady State Universe. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Not the end of a theory for a new theory... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> but the end of a universe for a new universe. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Based on observations.. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > >>>>>> > >>>>>> oh, btw...i found the Blue. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> but yous guys (including albert einstein) made a big mistake of dropping one theory for another theory, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> when they both were correct. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Where do you guys learn physics from???? > >>>>> > >>>>> Besides this, the green area of the photograph is what is illustrated below: > >>>>> > >>>>> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > >>>>> > >>>>> Here is an illustration of what caused the big bang... > >>>>> > >>>>> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d2/Olber%27s_Paradox_-_All_Points.gif > >>>>> > >>>>> Except, you guys got the paradox.... backwards. > >>>>> > >>>>> Where do you guys learn physics from???? > >>>> > >>>> For example...according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olbers%27_paradox > >>>> > >>>> " In the hypothetical case that the universe is static, homogeneous at a large scale, and > >>>> populated by an infinite number of stars, then > >>>> any line of sight from Earth must end at the (very bright) surface of a star and > >>>> hence the night sky should be completely illuminated and very bright. > >>>> This contradicts the observed darkness and non-uniformity of the night." > >>>> > >>>> They got this Olber thing (including Olber) ...backwards. > >>>> > >>>> The green area here that is... > >>>> > >>>> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > >>>> > >>>> "populated by an infinite number of stars" > >>>> > >>>> any line of sight from Earth must BEGIN at the (very bright) surface of a star > >>>> > >>>> (which is the red area you see here) > >>>> > >>>> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > >>>> > >>>> that which you call the big bang is "the (very bright) surface of a star". > >>>> > >>>> Not "must end at the (very bright) surface of a star", but must BEGIN at the (very bright) surface of a star. > >>>> > >>>> Where do you guys learn physics from???? Who gets all this stuff ...backwards? > >>> > >>> > >>> Now, here is an 'illustration' of what 'the before and after big bang photo' looks like...sideways: > >>> http://journalofcosmology.com/images/WormHoleDiminsions66.jpg > >>> > >>> > >>> A is the steady state universe and B is the present big bang. > >>> > >>> > >>> It's this photo, but sideways illustrated. > >>> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > >>> > >>> > >>> The green is A and the B is red. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> and this is the illustration of what happened moments before A transformed to B > >>> > >>> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d2/Olber%27s_Paradox_-_All_Points.gif > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> just looking for more space: > >>> http://journalofcosmology.com/images/WormHoleDiminsions66.jpg > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Actually...if you believe the universe is ...flat, then picture a flat...cone. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Where do you guys learn physics from???? > >>> > >>> > >>> from stupid proffesors?? oh, go back to skool, you're gonna learn a lot more, ain't you? > >>> > >> Looking at those links ... it's easy to see that you have *NEVER* > >> learned any physics!! > >> > > > > > > Is there a mistake that you see or error you can point out? Or you don't have a leg to stand on... > > > What?? You mean like the links don't seem to show what you reckon they > show?? Sure, there's an error!! > > -- > Daniel Which link are you refering to and where is the error exactly? ...or are you one of those vague people with their drive by shootings...