Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 10:42:08 -0700 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 113 Message-ID: <59A5A770.63EC@ix.netcom.com> References: <59A46D8A.1BDF@ix.netcom.com> <59A50D29.267D@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com NNTP-Posting-Host: X9ItFNC7Zcz4l6MobL/YRA.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 170829-6, 08/29/2017), Outbound message X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:647758 sci.physics.relativity:430390 Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am 29.08.2017 um 08:43 schrieb The Starmaker: > > Thomas Heger wrote: > >> > >> Am 28.08.2017 um 21:22 schrieb The Starmaker: > >> .. > >>>>> In a very brief nutshell, all "things" have been replaced by fields > >>>>> which extend over ALL space and time. They don't live IN space and time > >>>>> like you imagine particles or ping pong balls. They are part of the > >>>>> fabric OF space and time. > >>>>> > >>>>> There are ripples in these fields, which have behavior constrained by > >>>>> symmetries of nature, which are more fundamental in a deep sense than > >>>>> the conservation laws of nature. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Well, I do in fact agree upon most parts. But I am an amateur and have > >>>> written about , what you think, that amateurs are unable to understand. > >>>> > >>>> It's mainly my own invention, (thou influenced by a couple of people). > >>>> > >>>> I call it 'structured spacetime' and you can read about it here: > >>>> > >>>> https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6 > >>>> > >>>> I have written this 'book' about eight years ago and have since then > >>>> tried to find some audience for my idea. Didn't really work. But I still > >>>> think, the concept is correct. > >>>> > >>>> TH > >>> > >>> > >>> The Big Dipper and the little dipper is an example of...'structured spacetime'. > >>> > >> > >> ?? > >> > >> Actually I had tried to connect GR and QM in this way: > >> > >> I take spacetime of GR for granted and build particles out of that (to > >> replicate QM from the 'GR side'). > >> > >> This is actually possible. I assume, that spacetime consists of the > >> equivalent of a point, called 'elements' (of spacetime). These elements > >> are kind of points with features. > >> > >> These elements are connected similar to how quaternions are multiplied. > >> > >> By this the state of an element is conserved in time. This builds > >> 'timelike stable patterns' and those are, what we call matter. > >> > >> IOW particles are not real, but more like patterns or structures. > >> > >> As proof of concept I wanted to use 'Growing Earth'. > >> > >> So I spent a good part of the last year in the attempt to prove GE. > >> > >> TH > > > > > > If you're seeking an audience for 'Growing Earth... > > > > you have to use search and replace to redo it > > and replace keywords with 'climate change', > > explaining how climate change is causeing a > > 'Growing Earth'. > > > No. It's the other way round: Growing Earth is changing the climate. > > The 'climate change' is actually among the hints for 'Growing Earth'. > > This is because 'climate' means 'the average type of whether (and other > atmospheric factors) at a certain spot'. > > So: the change of climate over a long period of time at - say - Timbuktu > is 'climate change' (in Timbuktu). > > Now we know, that many places in the Sahara had been much greener a few > thousand years ago. > > Before there was green land, there have been marshes and before that, > the Sahara was the bottom of an ocean. > > So the amount of water changed over long time spans and that is, what we > call 'climate change'. > > This sinking sea-level is caused by the expanding planet, where the > surface builds cracks and rifts. Into these rifts the water flows and > the sea-level sink. > > Another effect from Growing Earth is the increasing heat inside the > planet, what generates more heat on the surface. This does also alter > the climate in many places. > > TH that's what I meant, how climate change is causeing a 'Growing Earth', or Growing Earth is changing the climate. i don't know if you have the keywords "climate change" in your 'Growing Earth' doc. I only suggest if you didn't, you can add it to your doc. Like for example, you can say Growing Earth is causing "cancer". You just do a search and replace on [KEYWORD] to tailor your audience.