Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.neodome.net!news.redatomik.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: What modern physics is really about, from a woodworker's view
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 22:54:46 -0700
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <59A3B026.7BD3@ix.netcom.com>
References: <onq8a4$1a70$1@gioia.aioe.org> <onqemj$1jcr$1@gioia.aioe.org> <59a10c26$0$61793$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com> <onrvbt$s3$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ons4ve$c2k$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ons7h6$gan$1@gioia.aioe.org> <29cdf7b2-7974-4adb-80dc-e9dab815136a@googlegroups.com> <onsi48$11e2$4@gioia.aioe.org> <6a7db4a2-9237-4e14-bfe8-94f19fe7ffde@googlegroups.com> <ont72o$1v5c$1@gioia.aioe.org> <59a23400$0$22779$c3e8da3$33881b6a@news.astraweb.com> <onudql$1hu5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <020778b6-6d11-41a9-8600-8bd493a04348@googlegroups.com> <onvf14$179j$4@gioia.aioe.org> <59A3A925.23D7@ix.netcom.com> <59A3AC04.6666@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: X9ItFNC7Zcz4l6MobL/YRA.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 170827-2, 08/27/2017), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:647525

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > >
> > > On 8/27/17 10:23 AM, john wrote:
> > > > Odd
> > > > "
> > > >>> If you remove all the field quanta that make up the sun, then of course the
> > > >>> field quanta that radiate from them will
> > > >
> > > > I wonder how you determine what is nonsense and what is not. Agreement with
> > > > experiment or gut feel?
> > > > "
> > > >
> > > > Oh boy.
> > > > "Field quanta".
> > >
> > > Yup. And what gives you a queasy feeling about that?
> >
> > In 1905, Albert Einstein used the idea of light quanta to explain the photoelectric effect.
> >
> > "Field quanta" is a modern word for "light quanta". It's just 1905 rehash..they both mean the same thing.
> >
> > it's poppycock. There is nothing about modern physics here except a few changes in words...
> >
> > it's fake modern science if it is nothing new...
> >
> > it's a con.
> >
> > How is ideas invented in 1905 modern science????
> 
> In other words... "Field quanta" is Einstein's 1905 "light quanta" which
> are "photons".
> 
> How is that modern science?
> 
> It simply is not.
> 
> But you do got a bunch of kids in skool who fall for anything, and have
> to...
> 
> It's like changing 'global warming' to 'climate change'..
> 
> it just garbage.


What's in a name? that which we call a rose. By any other name is old
science...