Path: csiph.com!news.redatomik.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Why is there something? Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 16:17:33 -0700 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 52 Message-ID: <5993810D.4725@ix.netcom.com> References: <75c7dfaa-960c-4465-85bb-2faec8b47035@googlegroups.com> <59909851.179D@ix.netcom.com> <7784400b-21a7-4a41-aece-a211543f31d6@googlegroups.com> <4ae8fab6-a35c-4345-aac3-3738e91acc62@googlegroups.com> <832d25a3-0c2e-4605-9067-353f0d954c9e@googlegroups.com> <59936db7$0$12039$b1db1813$2411a48f@news.astraweb.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com NNTP-Posting-Host: X9ItFNC7Zcz4l6MobL/YRA.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 170815-6, 08/15/2017), Outbound message Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:646084 benj wrote: > > On 8/14/2017 10:06 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 11:45:00 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 8/14/17 7:42 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>> On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 10:38:24 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>> On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 5:06:42 PM UTC+10, alal...@gmail.com wrote: > >>>>>> On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 4:35:50 AM UTC+5:30, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>>> On 8/13/17 3:56 PM, alal65536@gmail.com wrote: > >>>>>>>> I didn't want to read the book, as last time I read a book on > >>>>>>>> cosmology, it wasted my time by discussing quarks. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I've asked you what evidence you have that everything about quarks has > >>>>>>> been fabricated. You've produced nothing, absolutely nothing. So is > >>>>>>> there a reason you believe what you do? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I may be lazy, but I am not a liar. Over time, perhaps you will learn > >>>>>> to trust me. How solid is the evidence you have seen on quarks? How > >>>>>> reliant are you on other people? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Abhinav Lal > >>>>>> Writer & Investor > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > >>>>> > >>>>> Any theory worth anything must make valid predictions if that theory is > >>>>> to be considered scientific. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Which the theory of quarks does, many times over, verified in experiment > >>>> many times over. > >>> > >>> Really. > >>> > >>> Jet production in lepton and hadron colliders. > >>> > >>> Mumbo-jumbo. > >> > >> No, it's not mumbo-jumbo. It's perfectly understandable, even to lay > >> readers. > > > > If it is perfectly understandable to lay readers then explain it in a few lines. > > > Sorry Banjo, But Odd doesn't do explanations. He just tells people to go > look it up in some book. explainations are subject to 'alternative explainations' and the odd only wants one explaination...The Way of The Odd, or the Highway.