Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!216.166.98.84.MISMATCH!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 12:12:30 -0600 Message-ID: <587D0D0E.207E@ix.netcom.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:12:30 -0800 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy Subject: Re: The Moon References: <5873E9C8.7684@ix.netcom.com> <58747541.D1B@ix.netcom.com> <587475FB.2117@ix.netcom.com> <5875D920.C9E@ix.netcom.com> <58787572.1D12@ix.netcom.com> <587923F4.4753@ix.netcom.com> <5879C8E1.5642@ix.netcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 72 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47 X-Trace: sv3-sySYxYf7g/gl7eFbJkq7Qj4Xmvd5A1WHeh0f83mPVnljgJkO+TFagZi0MYR91Hj6xeDPKQ24YS8paUK!nScm8VYNeebq793RJbkR3zDb+KCjm6yFjMJCLFbvA2g55g7gdfBcMSchrexYyMIcmRzV4UH3M8Fr!XBoKr43ZG6w= X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 3555 Xref: csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:462540 sci.physics:613379 sci.physics.relativity:405814 alt.astronomy:288888 The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.google.com/#q=Researchers+Suggest+New+Theory+for+the+Moon%E2%80%99s+Origin > > > > > > > https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/01/moon-formation-theories/504449/ > > > > > > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/01/09/moon-formed-merger-20-little-moonlets-new-theory-suggests/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It could only mean one thing....a trip to the moon. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to stop their ridiculous bickering and stupid theories. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know why yous even bother with these 'new theroies' about the moon, ...you're going to > > > > > > throw them away anyway by next week. > > > > > > > > > > probably it's because no matter what theories yous come up with, there is always something ...missing. > > > > > > > > every single theory is missing > > > > > > > > something > > > > > > take for example.. > > > > > > Einstein's theory of relativity > > > > > > from it comes the big bang theory.. > > > > > > but then the question is asked > > > > > > 'what caused the big bang?' > > > > > > that part is ...missing. > > > > > > Or Darwin's theory of evolution.. > > > > > > the question is asked, 'what is the origin of life?' > > > > > > that's *missing* from his theory.. > > > > > > He even try to hide the missing part by saying: > > > > > > "it is mere rubbish thinking at present of the origin of life;.." > > > > > > So, every theory is missing something... > > > > Charles Darwin spent many years putting together his theory and book The Origin of the Species, but > > > > he left out the most important part...the origin of the species! > > > > I think he said 'it is mere rubbish thinking at present of the origin of species'. > > Now, Albert Einstein died tryin to find a unified theory... > > maybe something was...missing. but it will take about 500 years before anybody finds out what was missing, then...something else turns up missing. In other words, these "theories" are turtles all the way down.