Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!216.166.98.84.MISMATCH!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 13:01:11 -0600
Message-ID: <587923F4.4753@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:01:08 -0800
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy
Subject: Re: The Moon
References: <5873E9C8.7684@ix.netcom.com> <58747541.D1B@ix.netcom.com> <587475FB.2117@ix.netcom.com> <5875D920.C9E@ix.netcom.com> <58787572.1D12@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 61
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47
X-Trace: sv3-wYCc5888PYnscEaIFGzPJiHuZdys/fnlBLjN8t2PtBnYFctnNvIUcrInWE5Ts2KYNnsHPAiYf5xkJsZ!g68E/zmzwu6Rq6Ql/k6VAWz30w+KBHgilUq6hHXdKdDjTb9QRn6EEDmGXgH08W38vNY5gI/1C2TR!QBWLst+KBK4=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2941
Xref: csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:462336 sci.physics:612947 sci.physics.relativity:405458 alt.astronomy:288812

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.google.com/#q=Researchers+Suggest+New+Theory+for+the+Moon%E2%80%99s+Origin
> > > > > https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/01/moon-formation-theories/504449/
> > > > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/01/09/moon-formed-merger-20-little-moonlets-new-theory-suggests/
> > > > >
> > > > > It could only mean one thing....a trip to the moon.
> > > > >
> > > > > to stop their ridiculous bickering and stupid theories.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I don't know why yous even bother with these 'new theroies' about the moon, ...you're going to
> > > > throw them away anyway by next week.
> > >
> > > probably it's because no matter what theories yous come up with, there is always something ...missing.
> >
> > every single theory is missing
> >
> > something
> 
> take for example..
> 
> Einstein's theory of relativity
> 
> from it comes the big bang theory..
> 
> but then the question is asked
> 
> 'what caused the big bang?'
> 
> that part is ...missing.
> 
> Or Darwin's theory of evolution..
> 
> the question is asked, 'what is the origin of life?'
> 
> that's *missing* from his theory..
> 
> He even try to hide the missing part by saying:
> 
>  "it is mere rubbish thinking at present of the origin of life;.."
> 
> So, every theory is missing something...




Charles Darwin spent many years putting together his theory and book The Origin of the Species, but

he left out the most important part...the origin of the species!


I think he said 'it is mere rubbish thinking at present of the origin of species'.