Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!216.166.98.84.MISMATCH!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:36:23 -0600
Message-ID: <58787572.1D12@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:36:34 -0800
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy
Subject: Re: The Moon
References: <5873E9C8.7684@ix.netcom.com> <58747541.D1B@ix.netcom.com> <587475FB.2117@ix.netcom.com> <5875D920.C9E@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 57
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47
X-Trace: sv3-f4cnuiMaxMG/fCMtOiff06nY32IP4i/ELv78jyDqjvsufHvE4XetFyoj5KSRgIh7/oHlBpfhj64AJLK!N7Nky5Dg24PY1jiSKuPQx/MiKUXC/mMQE20gufnboU+VREBQY3tgqGwisw9Rp+3HiJ/CaiQV3hsX!CSC6YQpu5iU=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2541
Xref: csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:462300 sci.physics:612862 sci.physics.relativity:405408 alt.astronomy:288806

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > https://www.google.com/#q=Researchers+Suggest+New+Theory+for+the+Moon%E2%80%99s+Origin
> > > > https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/01/moon-formation-theories/504449/
> > > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/01/09/moon-formed-merger-20-little-moonlets-new-theory-suggests/
> > > >
> > > > It could only mean one thing....a trip to the moon.
> > > >
> > > > to stop their ridiculous bickering and stupid theories.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I don't know why yous even bother with these 'new theroies' about the moon, ...you're going to
> > > throw them away anyway by next week.
> >
> > probably it's because no matter what theories yous come up with, there is always something ...missing.
> 
> every single theory is missing
> 
> something


take for example..

Einstein's theory of relativity


from it comes the big bang theory..

but then the question is asked

'what caused the big bang?'

that part is ...missing.




Or Darwin's theory of evolution..


the question is asked, 'what is the origin of life?'

that's *missing* from his theory..

He even try to hide the missing part by saying:


 "it is mere rubbish thinking at present of the origin of life;.."


So, every theory is missing something...