Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!216.166.98.84.MISMATCH!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:29:49 -0600
Message-ID: <58751A0B.6D@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 09:29:47 -0800
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy
Subject: Re: Time Travel Is Not Possible
References: <5866B352.6F63@ix.netcom.com> <fo6j6cl983qptq87vcgee3bi4p8g10nheg@4ax.com> <5869A521.5FCE@ix.netcom.com> <ectnrnF5fvnU1@mid.individual.net> <o4em6u$1o6f$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ed0lrdFr91lU2@mid.individual.net> <o50ure$npd$1@gioia.aioe.org> <edjb78Fev35U1@mid.individual.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 33
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47
X-Trace: sv3-ayEB8bGpNWCzXd+6JgkoMIYJxis4KA2K2kRIv3zyVHibDzA/1bdKG0ox57cFChTXKaS3cHHwJpEefnK!+imvHdMeWSJYW35Z1IaF3nea6yAXOHp+fTLYEUTVyO6FfhcVJe41XjnbeDuHOMX61tABQeGs4Z5d!s3MZ/JMQ
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2251
Xref: csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:462026 sci.physics:612376 sci.physics.relativity:404965 alt.astronomy:288751

Sylvia Else wrote:
> 
> On 10/01/2017 8:20 AM, Sharilyn Vore wrote:
> > Sylvia Else wrote:
> >
> >>>> It's the outcome if a time traveller causes a branch in the past, but
> >>>> returns to his original time line when he goes back to the future.
> >>>
> >>> Cant go back to a future. Absurd contradiction.
> >>>
> >> Are you under the impression that arguing about semantics (or even just
> >> the meaning of words) contributes anything to our knowledge in this
> >> area?
> >
> > That's not semantics, lady. Read again. The thing is absurd, end of story.
> >
> 
> You're not advancing your position very much. What exactly is it that
> you think is absurd, and why?
> 
> Sylvia.


Ever heard the expression...never look back?



It's very simple, traveling back in time is not possible because Nature does not allow it.


It doesn't even encourage you to look back...

and if you try..bad things happen.