Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 22:21:13 -0600
Message-ID: <58673243.3914@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 20:21:23 -0800
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy
Subject: Re: Time Travel Is Not Possible
References: <5866B352.6F63@ix.netcom.com> <ecoi0bFsa08U1@mid.individual.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 35
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47
X-Trace: sv3-ZuIS2dzvFI44oB+WiLBRxgotd/oGQo2K1/QGSkFDts+qzHab2ipc51savlfMCw4sqW7105SOZMYpRvX!7paCHf2Pe72a5zG6/XVlVibJbXhr1g2Ix+gVSq46yvGeP9zMWjzdrnS0WzCU9l87Ab01+qBydTA5!sv33D4yatxE=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2026
Xref: csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:461253 sci.physics:610986 sci.physics.relativity:403566 alt.astronomy:288467

Sylvia Else wrote:
> 
> On 31/12/2016 6:19 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > lets say
> > you travel back in time
> > in a time machine and your
> > time machine lands on your
> > grandfather and kills him...
> >
> >
> > Time Travel Is Not Possible.
> >
> >
> >
> > Any answers you give saying time travel is possible would be...absurd answers.
> >
> >
> >
> > i don't want to hear absurd answers like you come back in unproven paralell universes
> > where your father and grandfather still exist...
> >
> >
> >
> > i don't want to hear it!
> >
> 
> Why not? You're effectively saying that the Universe has a particular
> form, one in which your proof works. That's akin to a circular argument.
> Maybe the universe does have such a form, and time travel really is
> impossible, but you have no proof of that.
> 
> Sylvia.


I would say by now somebody in the far future would be here now...