Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 15:40:32 -0600 Message-ID: <584881E2.2A45@ix.netcom.com> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:40:50 -0800 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy Subject: Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? References: <5846EA7C.7D57@ix.netcom.com> <584748AC.47AF@ix.netcom.com> <5847B30B.2AAE@ix.netcom.com> <4e464879-b7d4-4033-b56f-cb4f4d95561a@googlegroups.com> <5848569E.2355@ix.netcom.com> <2d18afc7-cf91-41bd-b87d-fa0ea046ebd5@googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 125 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47 X-Trace: sv3-KICja+El34g2GIjPYiuvVg8bpKKbCamtNSDB69xmHxE7Mg1Hy3b0gVywAjcCvUwtHpFi4UvObFsGkCF!Vs/KuryPd0tnaoX5eql7jiPUK3mf84SMT/KGgU/r7DHXnk76MO7RgtGAO0bQaJra82mrtUXVu50d!tVUxPntxIw0= X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 5833 Xref: csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:459174 sci.physics:608219 sci.physics.relativity:401057 alt.astronomy:288010 edprochak@gmail.com wrote: > > On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 1:36:17 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > edprochak@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 1:57:51 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Michael Moroney wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker writes: > > > > > > > > > > >Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein: > > > > > > > > > > >http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg > > > > > > > > > > >Do you wanna see more? > > > > > > > > > > Was that supposed to be a joke? You said an "actual design of a bomb by > > > > > Albert Einstein" but that looks more like a kid's drawing that took all > > > > > of three seconds to do. > > > > > > > > > > > > I never said Albert Einstein was a great artist! Why are people > > > > criticizing his..art? It's not art, > > > > it's a design for a bomb..that he drew on his letterhead. > > > > > > > > > > You were criticizing him for a mistaken estimate of the weight > > > of an atomic bomb. > > > > > > SM: "Albert Einstein was wrong about that. That's a fact." > > > > > > You posted the image presumably to show he was involved in the design. > > > > > > > He could have put it on a match cover...it's his idea, > > > > what difference does it make if it looks like > > > > a 3 year old drew it, it's an idea for a bomb, not a Piacasso drawing. > > > > > > No one criticized his drawing. We criticized your posting of it. > > > If your point was not a criticism of his estimation of the design > > > of the first atomic bombs, then what's your point? > > > > > > ed > > > > > > The original poster wrote: bombs, meaning more than one bombs > > > > "After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual design of > > the bombs." > > > > > > I posted one design of bombs Albert Einstein was involved in... > > > > > > Did you see Albert Einstein's secret design of a Nuleaur Reactor for the making of the stuff that goes in a bomb???? > > > > The top part is a cut out of Einstein's nucleur reactor patent... > > the bottom cutout is a simple nucleur reactor design > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Lpage1-aaaaaa-aa.JPG > > > > A nuclear reactor is not a bomb. You just don't get it... Albert Einstein built the atomic bomb. That means *everything* that goes into the making of an atomic bomb. Including the nucleur reactor, the men of the manhattan project, all that was needed to build an atomic bomb was was designed by Albert Einstein. Here you have Albert Einstein's secret design patent of a Nuleaur Reactor for the making of the stuff that goes in a bomb The top part is a cut out of Einstein's secret nucleur reactor patent... the bottom cutout is a simple nucleur reactor design http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Lpage1-aaaaaa-aa.JPG In other words, all nucleur reactors are based on Albert Einstein secret patent design disguised as a refrideration process. The rest below is for reference... http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/1-s2.0-S0172219005001742-gr1.jpg http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/AtomReactorCutawayLarge-aaa.jpg http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/Lpage1.jpg http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/Nuclear.jpg any questions? http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html > > > > The rest below is for reference... > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/1-s2.0-S0172219005001742-gr1.jpg > > You call this heat exchanger design a pattern for making a bomb? > No name on the image, so we do not know who did it. > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/AtomReactorCutawayLarge-aaa.jpg > > A cartoon of a nuclear power plant (looks like circa 1950'a). > Not signed, but I don't think Einstein made this one. > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/Lpage1.jpg > > An image from a patent fro a refrigeration design. > Not a bomb design. > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Einstein-is-the-bomb/Nuclear.jpg > > High level concept of nuclear plant. Again not evidence of the origin. > > No bombs in any of these images. > > > any questions? > > none I expect you to be able to answer. > ed Now you're showing your stupidity.