Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!newspeer1.nac.net!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 22:52:19 -0500
Message-ID: <58156EB8.324A@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:53:28 -0700
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,sci.physics
Subject: Re: (Misleading) Correlations, sans Cause and Effect.
References: <68088aea-3893-40f6-b7ee-6943710c1928@googlegroups.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.27--8.16P.Seattle.2016> <5812D575.3AB1@ix.netcom.com> <58151a13$0$28928$c3e8da3$88b277c5@news.astraweb.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 36
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47
X-Trace: sv3-Z3v9gJQDz09KLtMbpLzPfamUKWkZ/TnsOJzR9/CyOPti1LjOtWWJogp/ksuo2P3XOfPOGXAHJ7ydajy!i7dfRBhs8kqNvnV7ZGhqPzjghrMffDxnm9GJ3MPdFLaVf/GlodikuCM+RM1N0wEY9OTQDbXF87GY!JwD9XeR2yuI=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2648
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:378441 sci.physics:602938

benj wrote:
> 
> On 10/28/2016 12:35 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> >>
> >> WikiPedia says: ＜＜  The Many-Worlds interpretation is
> >>   an interpretation of quantum mechanics that asserts
> >>   the objective reality of the universal wavefunction
> >>   and denies the actuality of wavefunction collapse.  ＞＞
> >>
> >> "Quantum Mechanics" should be called "Quantum Statistics"
> >> as it's just (misleading) correlations, sans cause and effect.
> >>
> >> "Virtual Particles" and "Probability Waves" are intrinsically random;
> >> nature, however, is not -- Randomness is just ignorance, nothing more.
> >>
> >> Just because something is too complex to _fully_ understand,
> >> like tomorrow's weather, it doesn't mean that it's _truly_ random;
> >> in fact, we _know_ that it isn't.
> >>
> >> _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past;
> >
> >
> >
> > What if you just discoverd your mother is not your mother...doesn't that
> > change your past?
> >
> Starfaker you journalist types are all idiots. You been taking fantasy
> lessons from HVAC?  What you THINK or IMAGINE does not change reality of
> what happened in the past. This is simply insane logic.
> 
> Of course Rolf is still an idiot too, since what I choose to do can
> change the future. The past is always fixed by what happened.


general theory of relativity does not forbid travel into the past