Path: csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 01:31:10 -0500
Message-ID: <57DB91E7.1D1@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 23:32:07 -0700
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy
Subject: Re: Vegetation is missing...on Mars
References: <57DADA8C.15E@ix.netcom.com> <57DB8C9E.3665@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 29
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47
X-Trace: sv3-PD5Da1ScJfbmz1OgFznLp+D0BJy24t5wrwAPt0owxwEpJcKPLJptJhA7KrjgFrVORRHDRttFNTRWX21!YFfP91sxQVxpdOeNDUNMMLcksCCIl3fOa9CPk/kkRbx8nYWuEOy5SigCOrJ8TCwiqn9kbHUJ2acJ!r9U7aTav7w==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2149
Xref: csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:451551 sci.physics:597130 sci.physics.relativity:392553 alt.astronomy:286242

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> >
> > Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere.
> >
> > Rocks.
> 
> Okay, since there is no vegetation on Mars,
> what is there that NASA doesn't see?
> 
> http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> 
> For one, rocks on Mars are spaced apart from each other...while the rocks on Earth are closer, more touching and  all over each other.
> 
> http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1
> 
> NASA will try to show comparisons, but they won't mention the differences.
> 
> They are either too stupid or crooks, or both.


Of course...there are other differences,

instead of looking for how they are alike, look for how they are.. unalike.

http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tracking=0&s=MARSROVER_1