Path: csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 12:22:41 -0500
Message-ID: <57B9E395.668E@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 10:23:33 -0700
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: clock rate
References: <05937284-e0db-4343-8360-48fd4ce5c0b8@googlegroups.com> <np5hh9$c8o$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fa972fe0-d95d-42b0-aa09-9c0a72eea7a8@googlegroups.com> <np7196$a1l$1@gioia.aioe.org> <0c5a50ac-3802-45b1-b832-447d8e49ff58@googlegroups.com> <37139726-ab06-4f5e-ba67-97a2da657e8d@googlegroups.com> <2646195c-06b1-4df5-aed8-d89b90391ada@googlegroups.com> <9d260b47-1822-49f3-8741-7c35c6971a12@googlegroups.com> <4154dbab-81e9-4de8-abaa-5223720d3085@googlegroups.com> <np8ug6$im7$1@dont-email.me> <d76a0f51-09f1-458e-998f-6c099e977b6b@googlegroups.com> <np97t3$bam$1@dont-email.me> <72172f5e-8726-4621-9d70-127a1b40db92@googlegroups.com> <np9en5$ufg$2@dont-email.me> <8d63ce51-ec69-49f5-99fd-0c3578de7114@googlegroups.com> <npbfi2$s4o$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 32
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47
X-Trace: sv3-eYtRBGOGs+8YNNDh4cMEffLSEbwliKFoZxbQ/+Gv5YJZW3F90rYCjmk3ZHvwo0uNIL+8pYTw/4o8f0y!+KNkTL4AzKPkBSsDen94IhoVEH0E+TbKhvuzt+ErSrq9LaxELPHawvQqYAdomcLGinf+QTMf+eZb!PH9V8hkMv4w=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2817
X-Received-Bytes: 2908
X-Received-Body-CRC: 86425331
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:594047

Poutnik wrote:
> 
> Dne 21/08/2016 v 01:19 xxein1@att.net napsal(a):
> > On Saturday, August 20, 2016 at 7:25:28 AM UTC-4, Poutnik Fornntp wrote:
> >> Dne 20/08/2016 v 11:48 xxein1@att.net napsal(a):
> >>> On Saturday, August 20, 2016 at 5:29:10 AM UTC-4, Poutnik Fornntp wrote:
> >>
> >>>>> xxein:  The former theory made no prediction that the latter theory predicted on.  You only assume or think it did.
> >>>>
> >>>> What is the problem with prediction of GR for the case ?
> >>>>
> >>
> >>> xxein:  There is no prediction by GR of the case.
> >>
> >> AS the GR math model is applicable on the scenario,
> >> there is a GR prediction for the case.
> >>
> > xxein:  OK.  Have it your way.  What does GR predict for this case?
> 
> Stop here and learn yourself what it predicts.
> It is your homework, not homework of others.
> 


xxein doesn't understand he is in a computer simulation and we are all
in his simulation.


xxein, you're dream is turning into a nightmare...and you're not going
to wake up..

it's time to change the dream.