Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!news.unit0.net!news.netfront.net!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Particles popping in and out of existence or switching states?
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 12:38:00 -0700
Organization: Netfront http://www.netfront.net/
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <57796998.7062@ix.netcom.com>
References: <dtqaqvF80q9U1@mid.individual.net> <dtse09Fki47U1@mid.individual.net> <63ed1a84-170c-400a-ae94-2694db2a1d48@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: adenine.netfront.net 1467574628 52394 108.219.229.47 (3 Jul 2016 19:37:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@netfront.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 19:37:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:587833

john wrote:
> 
> QM is PROUD of not having
> ANY mechanism. This is, of course,
> because they also don't have
> any underlying structure- so they
> don't NEED no steenking mechanism
> :)



it's not that QM doesn't have any mechanism...
it's that they don't know how to look for..
'the mechanism' behind QM, or any thing else where
a mechanism is not seen.


The Machine behind QM is ...hidden.



You're not suppose to see it.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---