Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.unit0.net!news.netfront.net!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: alt.atheism,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: FAITH Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 22:54:05 -0700 Organization: Netfront http://www.netfront.net/ Lines: 23 Message-ID: <576CCAFD.2975@ix.netcom.com> References: <5763A7C6.1F1C@ix.netcom.com> <5767FA52.2C4@ix.netcom.com> <5769BB14.49A3@ix.netcom.com> <9ec77750-cf70-4048-95a8-0388e22cda6c@googlegroups.com> <576A475F.F33@ix.netcom.com> <576B8531.9FB@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: adenine.netfront.net 1466747582 51102 108.219.229.47 (24 Jun 2016 05:53:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@netfront.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 05:53:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) Xref: csiph.com alt.atheism:2131011 sci.physics:586375 sci.physics.relativity:386579 rec.arts.sf.written:442958 Wisely Non-Theist wrote: > > For example, to know that God does exist would require a perfect > knowledge of all things. isn't that what I wrote? For example, to know that God does not exist would require a perfect knowledge of all things. Why did you remove the "not", when not means A?? For an atheist to claim God does not exist, would require of that atheist to have a perfect knowledge of ...all things. That atheist would have to be an omniscient being. Has anyone ever proved that Leprecauns don't exist???? --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---