Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: antijohn cersus johnboy Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 23:14:46 +0200 Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Lines: 69 Message-ID: <574B5BC6.10808@PointedEars.de> References: <4afeb487-d715-4496-b7a1-b632c946800c@googlegroups.com> <2d041eca-4e1e-48de-a81d-8b88d15f0f32@googlegroups.com> <0102766d-109a-4065-a6ae-e8bae3d8a55d@googlegroups.com> <4284aba2-090a-493b-b867-63e892f22f75@googlegroups.com> <2uWdne8hTrPFWNnKnZ2dnUU7-IudnZ2d@giganews.com> <2uWdneshTrONVNnKnZ2dnUU7-IsAAAAA@giganews.com> <03714469-6d0b-4284-b769-6573f84201db@googlegroups.com> <1703595.BWrpF7nYRo@PointedEars.de> <59df4de5-e04b-4867-bb68-31af22ee246b@googlegroups.com> <4cad8387-40e7-4bf1-97bd-7582a4727bff@googlegroups.com> <574AC87F.4040305@PointedEars.de> <181eeb2a-0dbd-4ad4-85c0-f439ada3d732@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: solani.org 1464556487 21609 eJwFwYEBgDAIA7CXZNCC5zig/59gAqexMwgGBGWr9VhiVZdbczi+sUygjpXC5u2Z65vZX/wsQhGr (29 May 2016 21:14:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@news.solani.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 21:14:47 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 X-User-ID: eJwFwQkBgAAIA8BKgAMkjjzrH8E7f0JjEuEBp1Ny37o7nU47tQTkPmazBftCGzBd6WXZDH2vmOlbiwrWD2kBFjk= In-Reply-To: <181eeb2a-0dbd-4ad4-85c0-f439ada3d732@googlegroups.com> Cancel-Lock: sha1:4TsBBPiobFf1HW+XvTnf+j+40OE= X-NNTP-Posting-Host: eJwFwYEBwCAIA7CXpEjBc6jD/09YEk7jzc3gjhev0I2Fh4pR2efUWSkdoTpr1PILjHNkCv4cdxFT Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:581574 john wrote: > One of the Thomases in the preceding post or thread or perhaps awhile ago > (a while) said: > > "Learn to quote." That was me. You would have known if you had learned to quote already. > I haven't figured that out for this iPhone6 piece of crap. You are blaming others for your mistake? > There are THREE axes of spin to create matter/antimatter. Nonsense. There are three *components* of a spin *vector*, but, basically due to the uncertainty principle, only one component can be measured exactly at a time. Hence the *projection* of spin along a *chosen* axis, and the possibility for a particle with *absolute* *projected* spin (+)S to have *projected* spins −S and +S. Because the spin vector as such is useless, it is the absolute of the projected spin or the projected spin itself that is usually referred to as “spin”. Spin is either specified as a dimensionless quantum number or with proper units as a multiple of the reduced Planck constant, ℏ = ℎ∕2π. > The FIRST contains the electron, making it up or down. The SECOND defines > the disc, wherein the electron is placed in the up or down position. The > THIRD, which precesses the disc positive or negative to the second, > decides matter or antimatter. Not even wrong. > You are missing a spin. You are missing the point. > That is why you confuse intrinsic electron spin (calling it + /- > interchangeably with up/down), with antimatter/matter. I have not said anything of the sort. In essence, I have pointed out that conservation laws in matter–antimatter pair production require the produced particle pair to consist of two particles where one particle has not only the opposite electric charge, but also the opposite spin, of the other one. > The same electron can be in matter or antimatter- No. > it will be 'up' in the one and 'down' in the other because it keeps its > spin. Not even wrong. > Do you see that, Thomas Pointed Ears? I see that you have no clue what you are talking about. You cannot even write my (nick) name correctly. -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.