Path: csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: antijohn cersus johnboy Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 12:46:23 +0200 Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Lines: 30 Message-ID: <574AC87F.4040305@PointedEars.de> References: <4afeb487-d715-4496-b7a1-b632c946800c@googlegroups.com> <2d041eca-4e1e-48de-a81d-8b88d15f0f32@googlegroups.com> <0102766d-109a-4065-a6ae-e8bae3d8a55d@googlegroups.com> <4284aba2-090a-493b-b867-63e892f22f75@googlegroups.com> <2uWdne8hTrPFWNnKnZ2dnUU7-IudnZ2d@giganews.com> <2uWdneshTrONVNnKnZ2dnUU7-IsAAAAA@giganews.com> <03714469-6d0b-4284-b769-6573f84201db@googlegroups.com> <1703595.BWrpF7nYRo@PointedEars.de> <59df4de5-e04b-4867-bb68-31af22ee246b@googlegroups.com> <4cad8387-40e7-4bf1-97bd-7582a4727bff@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: solani.org 1464518783 4933 eJwFwQcBwEAIBDBLPOMAOWX5l9DEBA/tCoPa2cU8bw7iWIZPErOIB6S+yXCxLV0cFQaUzT8A+hBQ (29 May 2016 10:46:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@news.solani.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 10:46:23 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 X-User-ID: eJwFwYEBwCAIA7CXBG2Vc6CD/09Ygk2j7iF4MJjkruONL6M0Q4+nrBhsqgPhbqF0u/Qcfz229LXVQbUU6wdu9hZU In-Reply-To: <4cad8387-40e7-4bf1-97bd-7582a4727bff@googlegroups.com> Cancel-Lock: sha1:KR9u6KPv6pnQVxnSAVYDKd91dqc= X-NNTP-Posting-Host: eJwNycEBwEAEBMCWCLuiHM7pv4RkvgOj8oQTdCxW0UCkrw7zHcm6z98uXaIR11qcdivE1ObMBwnTEJY= Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:581404 noTthaTguY wrote: > "john gave a tiny theory, that antimnatter spins oppositely from matter, Where did they do that? > but is there anyway to address that? (_any way_) Only insofar as if only one pair of a particle and its antiparticle would form, they would have to have opposite projected spins as total spin is a conserved quantity. That is, if, for example, an electron–positron pair would form, and the electron had projected spin +½, then the positron would have to have projected spin −½ for the total projected spin of the system to be 0. However, the absolute spin of either particle would still be ½, and the projection can be the other way around and still conserve total spin: an electron with spin −½ and a positron with spin +½. So it is already not true that all positrons have the opposite spin of all electrons; corollary: it is not true that the spin of all antimatter is opposite to the spin of all matter. Learn to quote. -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.