Path: csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 01:27:21 -0500
Message-ID: <574A8BE7.4AEE@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 23:27:51 -0700
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math
Subject: Re: How to be a "real" scientist.
References: <574747ce$0$45348$b1db1813$2411a48f@news.astraweb.com> <dqq38iFrud6U1@mid.individual.net> <5747e91f$0$57955$c3e8da3$c8b7d2e6@news.astraweb.com> <dqss0uFe730U1@mid.individual.net> <99270511-bf74-40f4-92f4-8f7340bdea12@googlegroups.com> <5749F99D.937@ix.netcom.com> <ae6c9baf-7b1c-4263-a678-2fa83dd92e43@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 66
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47
X-Trace: sv3-HT9r5jhi/XhRWOtmUlMnqf8UrC6VJ21RGjR7l+ms3JtUs584kjxAdfZKpdHNbC8PkJ0Cv7p620XlkN5!8AkIl2ZnvP0sZFkmPmhBFmRJp7S2b4ABmW3Wc748jFTN3jxWCQkTmzObi+DEkSOE+SFpgfcUpwWF!UOmePA0oYCg=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3242
X-Received-Bytes: 3354
X-Received-Body-CRC: 785812724
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:581394 sci.physics.relativity:384534 sci.math:334879

JanPB wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, May 28, 2016 at 1:03:31 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > JanPB wrote:
> > >
> > > On Friday, May 27, 2016 at 11:26:41 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It is legal to criticise whatever you like in physics (or any other
> > > > science).
> > > >
> > > > But your critique will not get very far. Especially inside such
> > > > locked-in communities  critique will not be heard, since the insiders
> > > > have no interest in listening to challenging statements from outside.
> > >
> > > No. It doesn't work that way. The reality is that _in fact_ there are no "challenging statements"
> > > in physics (or mathematics) "from the outside" to speak of(*). Physics and mathematics have
> > > evolved to the point where a significant amount of time and honest work is required to even
> > > understand the subject fully, let alone contribute to it.
> > >
> > > So the people "inside" can tell right away that such "challenges" are worthless but the
> > > "challengers" cannot understand why. Instead, they claim some weird "conspiracies" and
> > > vent on the Internet.
> > >
> > > (*) except philosophical
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jan
> >
> > That is complete garbage!
> >
> >
> > Real physics comes from...'understanding' without the mathematics.
> 
> Without understanding the mathematics you have no understanding of physics.
> 
> --
> Jan


I understand...
'this thing of yours'..
this invention yous
call...Math,

is just another
language yous
invented.

But, you're under
an illusion that it's real.

You are sooo close
to the math trees, that
you have to climb
mountains and bigger
moutains in order to
see the math forest.

You're in a mandelbrot.
http://guciek.github.io/web_mandelbrot.html

The more you click
the deeper you fall in
the more complicated it
gets...you become,
infected.