Path: csiph.com!goblin1!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.netfront.net!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Space-Time and Surrealism
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 23:13:06 -0700
Organization: Netfront http://www.netfront.net/
Lines: 63
Message-ID: <573C07F2.710A@ix.netcom.com>
References: <nhdppc$isl$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: adenine.netfront.net 1463551969 68919 108.219.229.47 (18 May 2016 06:12:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@netfront.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 06:12:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:578759 sci.physics.relativity:383673

hanson wrote:
> 
> The term "space-time" is idiotic & ill defined.
> It has a different meaning and explanation from
> author to author, each yelling at the other:
> "You must learn" in their hope to cram their own
> crap down other folks' throat... ahahahahaha...
> >
> In the real world there are 1D lengths or lines,
> 2D areas or surfaces & 3D volumes or spaces.
> But "space-time"?
> Is it the product of "Volume x Time"?,
> Is it a "Time in the Volume of Space"?
> >
> Semantics also says that "space" is a DIFFERENCE
> or an Interval between 2 points, 2 lines or 2 volumes
> or 2 times, which is what the SR/GR Lawyer-language
> uses and then leads to space-like, time-like, mass-like
> and certainly to _ass-like_ events, -states or -processes,
> >
> dubbed as Event-horizons, Roche-lobes, Schwartzschild
> Radius, Einstein Rings, or Expanding Space, without
> saying what it expands into, &/or/not specifying that the
> highfaluting expression of "expanding space" merely
> means an increase in the interval between 2 observations
> or happenings, that have nothing to do with any increase
> of 3D Space or Volume of some media.
> >
> Most of these terms mentioned above do NOT  exist
> in the real world, except in the agile minds of Einstein
> Dinglesberries in/during their worship of AE's sphincter:
> >
> AE:  "People like us, who **believe** in physics,
> AE:  know that the distinction between the
> AE:  past, resent, and future is only a stubbornly
> AE:  persistent illusion."
> 
> Einstein's language-use in/for SR/GR is akin to the
> depiction of Pablo Picasso's bizarre and distorted
> schmiers of the human face & form on his canvasses
> which is his realism that he called "Surrealism".
> >
> __ Both are Useless Yiddisher Street Corner Acts.__
> __________  aka Judenphysik  __________
> >


Let me put is simply, but not clear...

the past does not exist
the future does not exist
the present does not exist...
that means..
spacetime isn't going anywhere.




no spacetime
no time travel 
no time dimension.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---