Path: csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:57:37 -0500
Message-ID: <571FBA4C.6C7B@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:58:20 -0700
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Time AND Space is an Illusion
References: <5716A893.7508@ix.netcom.com> <dnp0k7FahljU1@mid.individual.net> <5717CEE5.D7F@ix.netcom.com> <dnqs4oFovhmU1@mid.individual.net> <571852a8$0$31281$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> <5718568F.AC3@ix.netcom.com> <57185ac1$0$46736$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com> <57186F26.349@ix.netcom.com> <c3f6c65b-6c62-474c-ac6e-dedae52d52ba@googlegroups.com> <5719C91E.6D80@ix.netcom.com> <9b5ccedb-adb4-4b95-abde-18fc88698002@googlegroups.com> <571A741E.5893@ix.netcom.com> <66eb2a1a-eb29-48be-a46a-ece46754b999@googlegroups.com> <571DB15A.10B6@ix.netcom.com> <b59cb544-4cd5-435a-a9a0-6a7cc452a0da@googlegroups.com> <571F0AAE.679F@ix.netcom.com> <05d4d5fe-bfc9-45c0-9c70-788e29fff2e2@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 28
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47
X-Trace: sv3-MqtPKurN88KZRcwlW2IGfD2S/hkWZU9EyNZQY6WEKChLfgPNhE5SKFyRHmdgJ7q7s8apa03340piYT6!ezKZH0qSfUPL5O117mk2tee50GY3Wd0i/OKYkG9NUdr7y/Izu9bIBxgZLApbs2100SpzPR6QmLrW!dP1LOK/Hsnk=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2537
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:573492 sci.physics.relativity:382298

Gary Harnagel wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 at 12:27:26 AM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Gary Harnagel wrote:
> > >
> > > Wow!  You didn't even look up the ROOT word of "etymological"?  You
> > > apparently were able to find it anyway because you said "etymological
> > > root" was redundant.  I could have just wrote "etymology" but sometimes
> > > redundancy is a good thing, like four atomic clocks in each GPS space
> > > vehicle.
> >
> >
> >
> > Since when is "redundancy" useful????
> 
> So what is it about FAILURE mechanisms that you don't understand?  



I don't understand who was talking about..."FAILURE mechanisms"?



are you talking in your sleep? or is this another ...switcherooo??


Every one knows already you cannot be trusted...too much switcherooos.