Path: csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 19:06:09 -0500
Message-ID: <57045325.1BBA@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 17:07:01 -0700
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy
Subject: Re: ORI Re: GPS Off Course
References: <56FED84D.30C0@ix.netcom.com> <ifudna7uNKJjUGLLnZ2dnUU7-e2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <ndon8r$had$1@dont-email.me> <ndpd7k$sqq$1@news.albasani.net> <ndpjv8$sfu$1@dont-email.me> <ndqv97$b4$1@news.albasani.net> <ndrjhn$s8u$1@dont-email.me> <ndu8tc$8t8$1@news.albasani.net> <nduiut$a2h$1@dont-email.me> <ndvq7f$1k6$1@news.albasani.net> <ndvs4e$1k1$1@dont-email.me> <ne0ufg$90p$1@news.albasani.net> <ne160o$6pa$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 47
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47
X-Trace: sv3-EOfc3jCJ2VCJh7roEMyggfLMnTlQoiFq6ldgUStQszZflfdus6L/yYECO2KubbI1yutZVevY1FWVGlj!GXG69/ePk7ELoSQg2OznAA07py8KGv7LyjwX8ejyurmR3RhHHsmyV1ZkDZElB5umZnR7REe1O3Xw!sZqQqGdDXLU=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2986
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:568150 sci.physics.relativity:381011 alt.astronomy:283672

hanson wrote:
> 
> "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> wrote:
> > hanson wrote:
> >> <relativity@paulba.no> "Paul B. Andersen" wrote:
> >>>
> >> hanson wrote:
> >> now Paul, tell me, and shine with SR/GR
> >> fundamentals. Millions of pages sing about the
> >> grandeur of "Space time". But they all have different
> >> interpretations of what it is and then formalize it
> >> into, say:
> >>>
> >> ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 - c^2dt^2    ..... [1].
> >>>
> >> Some say ds^2 is "space-time", others say that
> >> ds is "space-time", other still insist that ds^2 or
> >> ds are "space-time intervals", while others are
> >> adamant that "s" happens to be "space-time"
> >> Which choir do you sing with, Paul?
> >>>
> >> Now, Paul stay calm & don't sing like a castrati.
> >> Just tell me the MLT dimensions of "space-time"
> >>>
> >> Paul weaseled and sang:
> >> Why should I try to remedy your confusion?
> >> You can however see an application of the metric
> >>>
> >> hanson wrote:
> >> Paul, I am NOT interested in an "application"
> >> which is simply yet another interpretation.
> >> Don't get yourself into that "me too" trap...
> >>>
> >> I wanna know that the MLT dimensions of
> >> "space-time" are. Are you able to do that?
> >>
> Paul wrote:
> > No.
> >
> hanson wrote:
> Awww.. that is a shame, Paul. I am sorry to hear
> that. Maybe someone else will come and help you.
> So let us wait, hope and see.


there are only three dimensions..T time, is not a dimension, throw the T
out the window.