Path: csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:13:39 -0600 Message-ID: <56B19AA8.51B5@ix.netcom.com> Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 22:14:00 -0800 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.astro,sci.physics Subject: Re: Moon was produced by head-on collision? References: <56B056FB.522D@ix.netcom.com> <56B142DA.1ECD@ix.netcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 113 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.239.141.5 X-Trace: sv3-KmBQUMPLW3rnvigLJZGnl9e4NOqE525yuTJeMPgNgLSm8ynXpMvjZE9vkJTP+4eZZGjmoukpm77C+SY!FY7SFZtTmNqvcwt/RaiPtcI5yxA7hovl6fOqzYMuzw+swb0wcbIJy/0hjSkCintNPE03e8vGyvMJ!yj98C0deSg== X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 4357 Xref: csiph.com sci.astro:57665 sci.physics:550151 The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Yousuf Khan wrote: > > > > > > On 01/02/2016 5:27 PM, Steve Willner wrote: > > > > In article , > > > > Yousuf Khan writes: > > > >> My question is, if the isotopic evidence which was used to create the > > > >> Theia Hypothesis in the first place, due to a previously perceived > > > >> difference in isotopic abundances, > > > > > > > > The isotope ratios are _at least_ very similar, now seemingly > > > > identical within measurement accuracy. This tends to support the > > > > Theia hypothesis. If the Moon formed on its own and was somehow > > > > captured by the Earth, it would be expected to have very different > > > > isotope ratios. > > > > > > The Moon capture hypothesis was only one such hypothesis. That one would > > > still be excluded by this recent finding. > > > > > > Other ones that would still be viable are the Fission hypothesis, where > > > the Moon was once a part of the Earth, but due to an imbalance it > > > pinched itself off of the Earth. This would certainly maintain identical > > > isotope levels between the Earth and Moon. > > > > > > Another one is the Condensation Hypothesis, which suggested that the > > > Earth and Moon formed from the same section of the original solar system > > > nebula. So basically the two worlds evolved together as a twin planet > > > system. This would also pretty much maintain identical isotope levels. > > > > > > This site even says that if the isotope levels are different, then the > > > above theories would be unlikely, but now that the isotope levels are > > > similar, those theories come back into play. > > > > > > Theories of Formation for the Moon > > > http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr161/lect/moon/moon_formation.html > > > > > > Yousuf Khan > > > > The purpose of our moon is to make an ocean on earth. > > Or should I say...our moon helps in the process of making an ocean on > earth. > > Without our moon, we would not have an ocean...it wouldn't even rain. > > Now, if you're wondering how our moon got to the vincity of our > earth....that is > an entire different process...that's part of the ball rolling process i > mention elsewhere... In other words... it's very simple.. the point the earth is at the point the moon is at from the sun.. and each other was exactly where they were meant to be. it took a big bang to accomplish it. That which you call the singularity.. where everything is stuck together... and cannot move.. the shape of the singularity was a triangle. Now, I know for sure no one here has ever been told the singularity was the shape of a triangle. It is very simple geometry. If you understand the shape of the singularity... then you can understand the points at which the earth the sun the moon are where they are now. In other words.. the universe today is at it is because of a triangle. When the big bang occured... the singularity triangle points went in every direction.