Path: csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 23:19:25 -0600 Message-ID: <56988185.2D83@ix.netcom.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 21:20:05 -0800 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: Water ice found on the surface of comet 67P References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 37 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.239.141.5 X-Trace: sv3-QpX5XZLGK0GADPReL1kwiILADSlraBrDR+g9MXYSAUXNsdDmF7PuvDdWXv/MG1tL5aqZUTGr8OFVhgO!4rXB0hJK5DU3wiUvYjm1/dMn+bZ54/hfjYmSoTxJPeQmbnTgQYuuN9lCdGlqUVwHwAOqzOnE34PU!Lup8xdlXDw== X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 1928 Xref: csiph.com alt.astronomy:281183 sci.physics:545562 sci.physics.relativity:374031 rec.arts.sf.written:430965 Sam Wormley wrote: > > Water ice found on the surface of comet 67P Here on the Earth it's called "ice water". Pleas don't use stupid NASA unclear minds on Usenet. There is no "water ice", it's "ice water". Only cocaine NASA people burned out by taking too much cocaine talk that way. Don't you know how to take someone's unclear lanuage and correct it yourself? Or, why don't you write the Headline the way NASA *wants you and others* to read it: Water found on the surface of comet 67P I mean, come on...Get Real here! NASA just wants to swindle, defraud, cheat, trick, hoodwink, hoax, dupe, mislead, delude, fool you. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. Let me put it this way...How long do you think NASA would have You around them?