Path: csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 11:11:03 -0600 Message-ID: <56758FA6.5E97@ix.netcom.com> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 09:11:02 -0800 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: Is the universe curved or flat? References: <566B467D.3BA1@ix.netcom.com> <9e104241-bd34-499a-ae13-d21c6f5aa6f9@googlegroups.com> <566BB2D3.53B6@ix.netcom.com> <566DDC37.7057@ix.netcom.com> <566F2EF7.26E6@ix.netcom.com> <5670932A.75CB@ix.netcom.com> <56709F5F.39BC@ix.netcom.com> <5670A3A0.41C0@ix.netcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 24 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.239.141.5 X-Trace: sv3-ZwjvMgv7z35QSUL/63r0a1UwQrN4H4WCtbYcRCngOyP1JWq9dtIrnkUTJcy+AGBQcSumNPfPLkfcqlP!Of9gO+58QjxQ2ZaT23NyWcFgEZ92mR6+g61h6B3kiXJZS1aLnFSHGM+Tt3Hb1tQiEhdCpgZLF7w+!t2rXUZ6u6g== X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 1827 Xref: csiph.com alt.astronomy:279993 sci.physics:540278 sci.physics.relativity:372379 rec.arts.sf.written:429502 And people who come out with using the words 'curve and flat' in the same sentence are dumb: "WMAP nailed down the curvature of space to within 0.4% of "flat" Euclidean." Who do you think you're fooling? Let me put it this way... there is no such thing in outer space as '"flat" Euclidean'. God does not play with "flat" Euclidean. A lot of girls got what appears to be a flat butt, but if you look closer...it's curved.