Path: csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2015 17:08:49 -0600 Message-ID: <56369B87.5764@ix.netcom.com> Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2015 15:08:55 -0800 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Why is the universe flat? References: <562EE0FB.5CFA@ix.netcom.com> <3dcfe3c4-3c57-48c2-9e13-2ccc83ce22ad@googlegroups.com> <54d3b48a-fa95-4761-bde7-9e220b3f5884@googlegroups.com> <6e5c0ead-e1ec-4e7e-b42a-e33086b0766c@googlegroups.com> <39817069-f8e4-4931-9dd1-5b7167770ab3@googlegroups.com> <562FF9FE.6AD2@ix.netcom.com> <6147c7d4-fdb2-4532-99ea-55c34d12bef4@googlegroups.com> <5631C59D.6CB5@ix.netcom.com> <5631CE38.548C@ix.netcom.com> <5631CEEB.5F0D@ix.netcom.com> <5631D50E.6CE9@ix.netcom.com> <9dc793a9-abb5-4fcb-9023-d7769a661710@googlegroups.com> <56351D7D.4DA4@ix.netcom.com> <58480c77-eefc-4efa-8b73-06c0f0af93b0@googlegroups.com> <5582ce0c-ecae-414f-89c9-321d81df9526@googlegroups.com> <5b49359f-ccf2-41ad-9d54-73ff5c9177da@googlegroups.com> <56359979.2036@ix.netcom.com> <782dneWkEqkniKvLnZ2dnUU7-SudnZ2d@giganews.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 16 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 45.49.183.72 X-Trace: sv3-3nNZO/ZQzeN10vuEvs+4w8RqXTu6rESRRRyiUgC4ZAMJME0W4t8n5+AhDk62sidtWYAHObz9KHJiH++!XcwPstSkB1H4A6XGTWUWD0qYVwzaM5uLZ3L5LfgLWL6t2gmXMjbulv/N1Qm7HbVbZuNiNUKSbmrM!/2r45JHo X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 2501 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:529791 Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 10/31/15 11:47 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > the smaller things are, the closer you look.. > > and the farther you look ...closer, the more there is > > in the smaller things there are. > > Nope -- measurements of size are independent of how you are > looking at an object (not moving in your reference frame). > I wasn't talking about objects... I was talking about information contained in space.. a small area of space.