Path: csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 16:25:40 -0500 Message-ID: <562FF9FE.6AD2@ix.netcom.com> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:26:06 -0800 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Why is the universe flat? References: <2fe6cc0a-0d4a-4ccc-9b86-9e972510fb74@googlegroups.com> <77071cef-e1e9-4b5b-b142-a1c69a4ccd45@googlegroups.com> <884aa45d-396b-4019-bdba-9fed1d1e3f32@googlegroups.com> <9-OdnQ7F878gobfLnZ2dnUU7-I2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <-radnaQZmdR7yLfLnZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <-radnaEZmdQixLfLnZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <562A81DC.4350@ix.netcom.com> <817a393f-5fba-471f-9e4d-6d15a939db74@googlegroups.com> <562B1D92.2E74@ix.netcom.com> <60c37b64-1c69-4fc6-925b-27e0a08763bb@googlegroups.com> <562C6C1E.1927@ix.netcom.com> <562D5196.668E@ix.netcom.com> <562E73A3.729B@ix.netcom.com> <330c9719-ff88-47d7-9c94-ce08f84348e4@googlegroups.com> <562EACBB.2E0C@ix.netcom.com> <562ED4ED.7A49@ix.netcom.com> <473149b6-263d-4753-a986-73924a92b928@googlegroups.com> <562EE0FB.5CFA@ix.netcom.com> <3dcfe3c4-3c57-48c2-9e13-2ccc83ce22ad@googlegroups.com> <54d3b48a-fa95-4761-bde7-9e220b3f5884@googlegroups.com> <6e5c0ead-e1ec-4e7e-b42a-e33086b0766c@googlegroups.com> <39817069-f8e4-4931-9dd1-5b7167770ab3@googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 106 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 45.49.183.72 X-Trace: sv3-JkJr12qDm7RURK4DUNmjsCBYEdv8UXxdcabmj8U9HM60W6EEK9b3hYB79SWzj6yo/ufzGknYUc0zb+l!LbGLeselqD5wdpchuovKgAr97l8X0pVg5mA+NuKX7lps5G01V3+wopjM6LSpFy4mp8CC9ma4XhNb!qSZEMWYN X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 6118 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:528572 Ross A. Finlayson wrote: > > On Monday, October 26, 2015 at 8:34:32 PM UTC-7, Ross A. Finlayson wrote: > > On Monday, October 26, 2015 at 8:26:07 PM UTC-7, john wrote: > > > Burnt-out stars are shredded when > > > they fall back into the galactic center > > > and the energy from absorbed > > > neutrinos is reinvested into jets of > > > HEPs (high-energy particles) which > > > blast outward at .9c and produce new > > > stars in a never-ending cycle. > > > Similarly, the energy that electrons > > > are constantly radiating is returned to > > > them by their protons in the same way; > > > the electrons constantly accelerating and > > > radiating but never running out, while > > > the protons are constantly absorbing > > > and gravitating but never overheating > > > in a never-ending cycle. > > > No BB. > > > No "heat death". > > > No BS. > > > > Consider all of space-time somehow laid > > out in this resulting "continuum". First, > > the three dimensions of space, have to fit > > in the linear continuum. So, kind of like > > super-string looks to have three dimensions > > to store the relevant information, for each > > space dimension, here they are folded into > > the infinitesimals and infinities of the one > > dimension. This is simply in numerical resource > > terms. > > > > Then, and this is a "single-Universe" approach, > > also it is so for time, then all of everything > > for each instant of time started forever ago, > > and, has conservation and symmetry about the > > numerical resources as would represent each > > point in an infinite space-time in a continuum. > > > > So, BB Big Bang and SS Steady State are both, > > from our perspective or that of observers, then > > about where we are today, they're concurrent > > interpretations of the continuum. > > > > (Is the future already written out, no, I wouldn't > > know that it was.) > > > > And on we flow. > > > > This is for "final cause" from "first principles" > > for a purely logical mathematical physics that is > > scientific. > > One thing about the "spiral space-filling curve > as a natural continuum" is that the associated > geometry is of "points and spaces" instead of > "points and lines". So, that is an un-Euclidean > geometry. "un-Euclidean geometry"??? Did you mean: un-Euclidean un-geometry. or Did you mean: Euclidean un-geometry. or Did you mean: non-Euclidean -non-geometry. or Did you mean: non-Euclidean geometry? Get your text right! Or use pictures... It's bad enough no one can understand what you are saying... but when you use werds that don't exist in the english text language...i begin to wonder. How many other things you write that isn't...real? There doesn't seem to be any connection with what you are saying...and reality. It's like some kind of...joke. Are you with the C.I.A???? Maybe a Russian spy? Cause when you write stuff like "un-Euclidean geometry"...and it doesn't exist...it's called a con in my book. Don't we have enough con-artist in the 'scientific community'???? I mean un-scientific community..