Path: csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 17:15:20 -0500 Message-ID: <561447F7.5570@ix.netcom.com> Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 15:15:19 -0700 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astonomy Subject: Re: green stars References: <560E3D7D.3AA6@ix.netcom.com> <56123237.6ADB@ix.netcom.com> <5612D679.77FF@ix.netcom.com> <56136F95.21CB@ix.netcom.com> <561403D5.4FDA@ix.netcom.com> <24ff5372-ac04-40f1-96dd-741486226329@googlegroups.com> <5614226E.1DB4@ix.netcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 102 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 45.49.183.72 X-Trace: sv3-h6pc6eb6F1lojV0BcQFnSaSiVBuilO2ZYxvOoJ4EgZAca/Clir77W0zhMtWvInx2YFj7faDEetDrjTz!rMBrfcdNlPHm0pAEPIW5lRGcm5Pf5/lP2vFqrpTdnib9xdH2yErQ9QQ1X33vwtmvV7hLzGlnPSLF!ioxXhzyd X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 5328 Xref: csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:424240 sci.physics:524977 sci.physics.relativity:366367 pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > > On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 12:35:17 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 10:24:44 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 11:52:02 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > it explains why the Moon has so many craters and the Earth which is next to it...doesn't. > > > > > > > > > > This can be completely explained with one word. Erosion. > > > > > > > > > > > > That is not an explaination, that's 'just a theory'. > > > > > > > > I'm giving 'explainations', not theories, my work is ...beyond science. > > > > > > > > People wants answers, not....guesses. > > > > > > No, it is not a theory, it is not a guess, it is a fact. > > > > > > http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/craters/en/ > > > > > > "Three processes help Earth keep its surface crater free. The first is called erosion. Earth has weather, water, and plants. These act together to break apart and wear down the ground. Eventually erosion can break a crater down to virtually nothing." > > > > > > http://solarviews.com/eng/tercrate.htm > > > > > > "... On the Earth, however, which has been even more heavily impacted than the Moon, craters are continually erased by erosion and redeposition as well as by volcanic resurfacing and tectonic activity." > > > > > > You 'explanations' are incomprehensible garbage... > > > > > > > > I like the cartoons: > > http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/craters/en/ > > > > Why is it these 'socalledfacts' never have an authors name???? > > > > For the same reason why doctors where masks.... > > > > > > > > No author names... > > http://solarviews.com/eng/tercrate.htm > > I see your powers of observation are as poor as your science chops. You clearly didn't look very hard for the authors name, which is Calvin J. Hamilton, and the references he used are also there... > > "The information on this page was taken primarily from Koeberl and Sharpton. > > Koeberl, Christian and Virgil L. Sharpton. Terrestrial Impact Craters Slide Set. Lunar and Planetary Institute. > > Pilkington, M. and R. A. F. Grieve, "The Geophysical Signature of Terrestrial Impact Craters." Reviews of Geophysics, May 1992, vol. 30, pp. 161-181." > > > If you're going to post lies on a web page, you don't want your name associated with it. > > So, erosion is a lie? I don't know of any 'erosion' that exist that works on craters only. "However, we would like to caution against just using images or remote sensing to identify impact craters on Earth without corroborating petrographic and geochemical studies on crater rocks. Only such studies can provide confirming evidence that a geological structure is of impact origin." Translation: There is no confirming evidence a geological structure is of impact origin. http://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications/slidesets/craters/ "Introduction Impact cratering research has gained attention throughout the world following the suggestion..." "suggestion"???? Sounds like 'just a theory'. Now you guys are saying that it wasn't a asteroid that killed the dinosaurs but a vocano....and a asteroid (just to keep the asteroid boys happy). http://www.futurity.org/asteroids-volcanoes-dinosaurs-1018262/ http://news.sciencemag.org/climate/2015/10/volcanoes-and-asteroid-strike-may-have-done-dinosaurs I told you guys what killed all the dinosaurs already...they simply ran out of girl dinosaurs. There weren't that many chicks around...and they were ugly and smelly...stinky. Now today girls wear makeup and perfume. but they are still ugly and stinky....