Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!news.glorb.com!peer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 21:29:13 -0500
Message-ID: <5580DB8E.3886@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 19:29:34 -0700
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,rec.arts.sf.written,alt.astronomy
Subject: Re: Ceres5....How did it get there?
References: <557884D6.5E60@ix.netcom.com> <mla5r9$shh$1@pcls7.std.com> <5578A210.3B2D@ix.netcom.com> <5578A2B7.F2E@ix.netcom.com> <5578A384.210E@ix.netcom.com> <557FE226.5486@ix.netcom.com> <mlpk81$vih$1@pcls7.std.com> <55807760.7818@ix.netcom.com> <chine.bleu-73A539.12281616062015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> <5580866E.13E8@ix.netcom.com> <chine.bleu-6558E1.13334116062015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> <5580B763.3392@ix.netcom.com> <chine.bleu-C9219D.18005016062015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 34
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 23.241.144.149
X-Trace: sv3-Sm5tPQ+JOTo6Q5jAZaiMb+Pq5gZ0YK9av6GeSTL2yB5Z95Sx7Wdvu2pbq8i6dHpry6pC7tY1bOPv85y!j1VhW6znhWotXD+2Ip0eiMTLAZTgCvmOdRfrlhlzU6FNW54csVq0pftLPgeUnPX1BfxHknX/viXV!eWMSEv4Y+8s=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2399
X-Received-Bytes: 2511
X-Received-Body-CRC: 538501703
Xref: aioe.org sci.physics:500580 sci.physics.relativity:353335 rec.arts.sf.written:414059 alt.astronomy:269977

Siri Cruz wrote:
> 
> In article <5580B763.3392@ix.netcom.com>,
>  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> > Siri Cruz wrote:
> > >
> > > In article <5580866E.13E8@ix.netcom.com>,
> > >  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > It is not a question whether they have been retouched...the question
> > > > is.. 'Where' have they been retouched?
> > >
> > > Idiot, JPEGS use lossy comprehension. They always modify the image. That's
> > > why
> > > you have to look at the original images and their metadata.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Where is the original image? Anybody can edit "metadata"...
> 
> Why ask me? Ask JPL.


It was You who brought up "That's why you have to look at the original images..."


Everyone knows they don't want you to see the 'original image'.


That is why it's called...FRAUD!


The Starmaker