Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics Subject: Re: delusions about airplanes Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 05:26:58 -0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 37 Sender: Jim Pennino Message-ID: <22efcc-6pi.ln1@mail.specsol.com> References: Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="12009"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ocrUXWVyszyqZA4XRBv/F" User-Agent: tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5J2gsvH5zEZdYRH09T6/OXVQKAM= Xref: csiph.com alt.astronomy:275659 alt.conspiracy:267141 sci.physics:520619 In sci.physics Bast wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Rocky wrote: >> >>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but >>> the type of missile used didn't have a problem. >> >> Is that because commercial jets are always floating above the ground >> delusional fuckwit? >> >> Or is it that commercial jets have some sort of ground repelent, >> delusional fuckwit? > > > > > > Wait a second ???? > Which side are you arguing for ? > > As you are making a darn good point supporting the 9/11 truth movement. > Since you are correct that any large commercial passenger jet could never be > controllable because of "ground effect", and would have crashed, scattering > debis everywhere, long before it ever got near the pentagon. I see you haven't a clue what ground effect is or how it effects an airplanes performance. FYI ground effect has zero effect on the controllability of an airplane. The only thing that prevents an airplane, any airplane, from flying very close to the ground is the common sense of the pilot. -- Jim Pennino