Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,sci.physics Subject: Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:08:17 -0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 32 Sender: Jim Pennino Message-ID: <19bpac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com> References: <648cd79fd6b7856ac331c02ba509acc7@dizum.com> <_i3Cx.17952$%u.13620@fx06.iad> <8n7ucc.tl3.19.1@news.alt.net> Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="472"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+fUhgLDLehBIzoAALlCIJ4" User-Agent: tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:VvoVa67vBguevUbt9KtZdmn7sY0= Xref: csiph.com alt.conspiracy:264748 sci.physics:516137 In sci.physics Rocky wrote: > And yet it is you who has never been able to address what tell tale signs > are in the following: Nuclear exposions leave giant, fucking enormous signs, not "tell tale" signs, you babbling kook. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html Note especially that there were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by ANY seismograph ANYWHERE in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania WERE detected by nearby seismographs. -- Jim Pennino