Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: 2015 is Earth's warmest year - not Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 19:15:12 -0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 19 Sender: Jim Pennino Message-ID: <07tknc-8d5.ln1@mail.specsol.com> References: <2cvcnc-j29.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <0Kydnf0fLNJIATjLnZ2dnUU7-VudnZ2d@giganews.com> <0Kydnf4fLNJLPzjLnZ2dnUU7-VudnZ2d@giganews.com> <0_ydnemNwpd9_jvLnZ2dnUU7-N2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <46-dnaT_CYOyHTrLnZ2dnUU7-a2dnZ2d@giganews.com> Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="23382"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19R8YMVXAeL82hn0hjTmLRa" User-Agent: tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8I3zzkPsCdjTyK4h13YGawqLqwc= Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:548344 Sam Wormley wrote: > On 1/26/16 2:22 AM, Andrew wrote: >> I do not "like'' my data. I just want the truth. > > > The route toward the truth is taking the time to weed the wheat > from the chaff. Nobody can do that for you. May I suggest you > look at the observables over the last 50 years. And when one actually does that, one finds that the accuracy of the surface temperature stations are quite a bit greater than 1 degree, making claims of a global temperature estimate to 0.01 degree ludicrous. This is worse than high school level science; thinking an average value is more accurate than the raw measurments. -- Jim Pennino