Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.alt.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 18:51:05 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <pql66p$col$2@pcls7.std.com>
References: <pq4hpl$2c2$2@gioia.aioe.org> <487b2f4f-6011-437e-9715-d9de081d2c96@googlegroups.com>  <pq545f$144p$1@gioia.aioe.org> <b9063b48-731c-4ecf-9fa5-9ae77495cd59@googlegroups.com>  <a6fc3fd8-9b12-45ef-954e-8c41032e1e8b@googlegroups.com> <pq5k1u$1vf8$2@gioia.aioe.org> <1688c531-401e-414a-b779-b5cbefc7db37@googlegroups.com> <pq7s6m$1lkf$1@gioia.aioe.org>  <b6493560-1736-43a9-92da-5c69b24cb5a1@googlegroups.com> <pq8atm$g9p$2@gioia.aioe.org>  <59f27855-b7a4-4252-8f1b-bfff3d48e23b@googlegroups.com> <pqa9gq$1gdr$2@gioia.aioe.org>  <c62dd3fe-049e-4484-abe7-fe60c9b311e4@googlegroups.com> <pqbavs$16mm$1@gioia.aioe.org> <5279c02d-0a7f-4b7c-b7b8-58c13e4a2ef4@googlegroups.com> <pqcird$14dl$1@gioia.aioe.org>  <bb19dd95-e7b2-4b44-a883-6cd5751c6268@googlegroups.com> <pqfi2e$1rhg$3@gioia.aioe.org>  <c3f01d66-61bd-4ad4-bd11-49ec05ee856b@googlegroups.com> <pqfl6n$1jb$1@gioia.aioe.org>  <0712d8dc-1fbc-40e2-969e-a4c0cfb41b88@googlegroups.com> <pqg1uf$nje$1@gioia.aioe.org> <dc93aa70-1d5f-4451-ac00-4b3cb7023e34@googlegroups.com> <a49d85f8-1edf-48db-aaba-6fc8faaa7299@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1540234265 13077 192.74.137.71 (22 Oct 2018 18:51:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 18:51:05 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: nn/6.6.5
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:475500

rbwinn3@gmail.com writes:

>On Saturday, October 20, 2018 at 4:13:45 PM UTC-7, rbw...@gmail.com wrote:


>    If, as Einstein theorizes, a clock in frame of reference S' is slower than a clock in S,


No, he did not.

<snip rest as GIGO>