Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Koobee's revisionist history (was: The Einstein Theory of Relativity by H. A. Lorentz Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 00:26:37 +0000 (UTC) Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 Lines: 77 Message-ID: References: <7c9a5e74-b230-b2ea-3c7c-e303ea0b23d3@PointedEars.de> <429a62ab-6a1f-4030-bbb0-dab0fe6e33d1@googlegroups.com> <3d02eee5-13bb-4bfc-85f0-945ff5ce6a72@googlegroups.com> <575e21c1-4e3b-4f3d-ac11-768840160399@googlegroups.com> <89081339-50f8-4a4a-97b6-653e6bf3b33b@googlegroups.com> <056d99ae-eade-4cd8-8e9e-3fc08507b7bf@googlegroups.com> <67cfbe85-de69-4c4d-b7a3-2ae04e2dbc93@googlegroups.com> <9c9f9520-b734-4f63-a800-af9cdc85ef7b@googlegroups.com> <8c833c38-b6be-4bc6-a276-1d8364145ea3@googlegroups.com> <27633b73-15cb-4e11-8346-bafa7000de4b@googlegroups.com> <98893384-915f-49fe-a726-4cd5d0f6032d@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1536366397 10439 192.74.137.71 (8 Sep 2018 00:26:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 00:26:37 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: nn/6.6.5 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:470908 Koobee Wublee writes: >On Friday, September 7, 2018 at 10:20:46 AM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote: >> Koobee Wublee writes: >> > Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar knew about the >> > Lorentz transform and attempted a confusing and deceitful way of >> > re-deriving this formula. The Lorentz transform can only be derived >> > using the null results of the MMX. >> >> > Next, a simple modification to the Galilean transform using the >> > Lorentz-FitzGerald contraction is enough to satisfy the null results >> > of the MMX. However, this type of transform was not explored in >> > history. Instead, it was Voigt who proposed a constancy in the speed >> > of light, and the result is Larmor's transform where all observations >> > must reference back to the absolute frame of reference. >> >> > Finally, Poincare realized Larmor's transform can be simplified into >> > the Lorentz transform, but this simplification is wrong in general >> > where Koobee Wublee had already addressed in the past posts. >> >> > The road to the Lorentz transform cannot be anything else but in this >> > order, and this can easily tell who plagiarizes from whom unless you >> > are fvcking idiots. >> damn, I am out of both popcorn and beer! But thanks for the entertainment! >Go back to make your wooden sex toys, PD. Hahahahahaha!!!! Koobee has been messing with the quotes again and posting a revisionist quote string! As written Koobee makes it appear as if my 'popcorn' response was to Koobee's revised history. It was not; it was in response to Koobee's tantrum, to which Jan replied "This is a tantrum, not an argument." upon which Koobee had another micro-tantrum. This was repeated a second time as well. See: : Michael Moroney writes in : >Koobee Wublee writes: >>On Thursday, September 6, 2018 at 1:01:42 PM UTC-7, JanPB wrote: >>> On Thursday, September 6, 2018 at 11:08:36 AM UTC-7, Koobee Wublee wrote: >>> > The road to the Lorentz transform cannot be anything else but in this >>> > order, and this can easily tell who plagiarizes from whom unless you >>> > are fvcking idiots. >>> This is a tantrum, not an argument. >>Idiot! >This is a tantrum, not an argument. >>> > > It was not only _novel_ but also surprisingly _minimal_, previous >>> > > approaches at providing such physical basis had largely been ad hoc, >>> > > like the Fitzgerald contraction hypothesis, etc. >>> >>> > The garbled words in the above sentence contains no historic and >>> > scientific facts. These are the words that would be uttered from the >>> > idiots who worship Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. >>> > >>> >>> Again, this is a tantrum, not an argument >>Again, idiot! >Again, this is a tantrum, not an argument >(damn, I am out of both popcorn and beer!) >(But thanks for the entertainment!) I'll ignore the "wooden sex toys" comment other than to say that apparently Koobee must think I am a combination of PD and Odd Bodkin. Poor Koobee, repeatedly on the business end of a Size 12 Army boot!