Path: csiph.com!3.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Gedanken proves that clocks in relative motion accumulate clock seconds at different rates
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 22:35:05 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <pc85mp$fmi$1@pcls7.std.com>
References: <af166597-4938-4b0d-a7a7-189d1a221237@googlegroups.com>  <552826cc-d7c9-4b0f-bd79-d11e2f02de91@googlegroups.com>  <9zEBC.1155602$Ly1.172206@fx13.am4>  <f10cfc20-7852-4f36-8dd3-ef9f29ef4590@googlegroups.com>  <6nLBC.383085$Il7.91646@fx46.am4>  <eab25dc0-b86f-455c-a926-0c6b90ace992@googlegroups.com>  <h5jCC.945116$oi5.552519@fx43.am4>  <d15c28f6-8c96-4e5c-bbe0-8a2c50dff65b@googlegroups.com>  <RGYCC.980524$BA6.277352@fx29.am4>  <d56047ad-5398-4398-97f6-5a7e432b7b15@googlegroups.com>  <04MEC.21258$6D.3630@fx05.am4>  <3b90a404-9307-4106-83a9-4b5bb965534d@googlegroups.com>  <yCnFC.38787$MD7.32816@fx14.am4>  <80cdb594-feac-4d5d-82b5-d11d8a615d7c@googlegroups.com>  <H1JFC.119902$Vm6.106227@fx45.am4> <pc7o00$epn$1@dont-email.me>  <p2KFC.304167$LD3.31896@fx18.am4> <pc801l$8jd$1@dont-email.me> <SpMFC.127915$yN1.99566@fx28.am4>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1525127705 16082 192.74.137.71 (30 Apr 2018 22:35:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 22:35:05 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: nn/6.6.5
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:457259

Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> writes:

>On 30/04/2018 21:57, Volney wrote:

>>>> And all measurements confirm that Einstein was correct in doing this.

>no measurement ever confirmed that the velocity of light relative to the 
>observer is independent  of the velocity of the observer,

Except for all the ones that did, of course.

> and none ever 
>will, because actually it's an impossibility.

Wow! Scientists keep doing the impossible!

>>>>> Me i think clocks would just go on ticking at the same old rate 
>>>>> whatever

>>>> Finally you said something correct.

>Thank you Mr.Voley, and what i actually said was:

>"Me i think clocks would just go on ticking at the same old rate 
>whatever bull shit Einstein comes out with eh!"

Awww, you said something correct and then you went and ruined it!

> and prove that indeed Stein's Law is correct,

25. 20 points for naming something after yourself. (E.g., talking about
the "The Evans Field Equation" when your name happens to be Evans.) 

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html