Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy Path: csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!kithrup.com!djheydt From: djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) Subject: Re: Vegetation is missing...on Mars Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 20:52:24 GMT References: <57DADA8C.15E@ix.netcom.com> Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ld. X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Lines: 18 X-Received-Bytes: 1258 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1160439398 Xref: csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:451503 sci.physics:597084 sci.physics.relativity:392486 alt.astronomy:286234 In article , je suis charly wrote: >In article <57DADA8C.15E@ix.netcom.com>, > The Starmaker wrote: > >> http://graphics.wsj.com/documents/wsj_sliders14/?standalone=1&slideronly=1&tra >> cking=0&s=MARSROVER_1 >> >> >> Without vegetation, it's just rocks...everywhere. > >Bacteria is not visible at the magnification available. Nitpick: Bacteria are. Or in this case, are not. -- Dorothy J. Heydt Vallejo, California djheydt at gmail dot com