Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Why Should Gravitational Mass Equal Inertial Mass? Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 06:16:55 +0000 (UTC) Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1486793815 6791 192.74.137.71 (11 Feb 2017 06:16:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 06:16:55 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: nn/6.6.5 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:408800 "HGW... DSc." writes: >On 11/02/17 05:06, Michael Moron-y wrote more conspirational crap...: Ralph Malcolm, why did you claim to have plonked me when it is now obvious you still crave the attention I give you when I reply to your k00ky posts, Ralph? And why didn't you answer this simple question instead of just snipping it, Ralph? : Ralph, tell us why you believe experiments that are so simple that they : don't have the accuracy to tell the difference between c and c=B1v, yet : you poo-poo the more sophisticated experiments Paul lists that really : can tell the difference, and show that light from a moving source really : does move at c relative to the destination?