Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get?
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 03:29:32 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <nmhies$db0$7@pcls7.std.com>
References: <nktj3e$29b$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nlobkc$1b00$1@gioia.aioe.org>  <72c147c3-534a-47f3-bf52-d323a6d8bc72@googlegroups.com>  <nlti6i$2u6$3@gioia.aioe.org>  <e887c92e-e301-43bd-907f-2b10b0ccb54c@googlegroups.com>  <nm04f7$1kl3$2@gioia.aioe.org>  <5ef109c1-3636-4e71-b886-530e76cd087a@googlegroups.com>  <nm0a11$1usc$1@gioia.aioe.org> <b0b02e76-e78a-4c0a-8bec-70d4cb68b403@googlegroups.com>  <nm2rc5$1mkk$4@gioia.aioe.org>  <846584ca-69f0-4cf0-829f-9f717129b468@googlegroups.com>  <nm5gal$1jm4$2@gioia.aioe.org>  <eaec7e02-4b9c-4fac-ab39-96022fb0b060@googlegroups.com>  <nm87c2$1d4s$5@gioia.aioe.org>  <06e0af09-bacc-4b8d-a4d3-0316002c7a8a@googlegroups.com>  <nmaujv$1e49$2@gioia.aioe.org>  <62e6c3bd-8786-4a04-ac0c-f7842943b2a4@googlegroups.com>  <nmbi3r$d9q$3@gioia.aioe.org>  <88baffa5-e205-437c-a0b1-252bc8d9bb98@googlegroups.com>  <nmdsbb$17te$3@gioia.aioe.org>  <9b743f50-6431-4359-9a10-7cfe8968225c@googlegroups.com>  <zaGdnWR7m5YTORbKnZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com> <nmh1l4$196u$1@gioia.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1468812572 13664 192.74.137.71 (18 Jul 2016 03:29:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 03:29:32 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: nn/6.6.5
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:387940

"HGW." <hw@....> writes:

>On 18/07/16 01:30, Tom Roberts wrote:

>> [#] We do have a robust technique for representing the ORDER (not
>> "direction") of such time differences. But it involves negative
>> numbers which confuse you so much. You STILL have not figured out
>> what (-6)/(-2) is.

>I don't wish to argue about the conventional answer but there could be
>another way to look at this.

>If number was considered to exist as two separate domains, positive or
>negative, then -6/-2 would be 6/2 in the negative domain which would 
>produce the answer 3 in the negative domain..or -3 as we know it.

Ralph, you don't know how to solve (-6)/(-2) either?  Meaning you are
just as dumb as Stipid Ken??