Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativity of Simultaneity (RoS) is a bogus concept of physics
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 03:14:50 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <nmhhja$db0$3@pcls7.std.com>
References: <830ba67c-65ca-4831-b93b-6408ddaeb7e7@googlegroups.com>  <nm6fe8$176b$1@gioia.aioe.org> <98bc4eaf-5569-4738-9978-89e5cb80c403@googlegroups.com>  <nm9699$11jd$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nmal1h$rof$4@gioia.aioe.org>  <nmbo7m$lvq$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nmdrth$179e$1@gioia.aioe.org>  <nmebnm$1tcg$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nmes1c$q79$3@pcls7.std.com> <nmf2gu$i9u$1@gioia.aioe.org> <8cc679d5-4f47-404a-912f-32b6a3eec4a8@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1468811690 13664 192.74.137.71 (18 Jul 2016 03:14:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 03:14:50 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: nn/6.6.5
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:387937

Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> writes:

>On Saturday, July 16, 2016 at 10:45:20 PM UTC-6, HGW. wrote:
>>
>> On 17/07/16 12:54, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> >
>> > > > 'at its fastest, travel at c.'
>> > >
>> > > c, relative to what?
>> >
>> > Relative to anything you want, Ralph.  That's the whole point of the
>> > invariance of c.
>> >
>> > > The rod caused to spin from its mid point....not that this matters.
>> > > When any transients have settled down,
>> >
>> > Transients, Ralph? Without "transients" no information can be communicated
>> > by the spinning of the rod, so it is unnecessary.
>> >
>> > > Of course a perfectly rigid rod would not have any such
>> > > transients.
>> >
>> > No such thing as a "perfectly rigid rod" as that would require infinite
>> > communication speed.  Consider a rigid rod 1 light second in length,
>> > perfectly stationary and not rotating.  At T=0 I start rotating one end.
>> > When does an observer at the far end notice the rod is rotating?
>> 
>> Hey Moron-y, forget your religion and learn some basic physics will yu....

>This response means that Ralphie-boy doesn't want to answer the question
>that destroys his fake physics :-)

Yup, just like idiot Ken, all Ralph can do when cornered is insult away...