Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Thomas Heger Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Technical details Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2026 06:32:17 +0200 Lines: 51 Message-ID: References: <18bd81f76f4d1a73$215267$260416$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <1123iiu$219ku$1@dont-email.me> <6A495D4A.1A88@ix.netcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net Pf5kGlzmCPQ2NuqAIy/tcQNQJLJeNyjWq4LQnoWD30QwCUqgi4 Cancel-Lock: sha1:7UUamnsEngWBVTu6wWD9vDkBhs4= sha256:1yzv7EcOK4nu3qUPETLvDMwF8mZyau3HeMCxBIEsKDM= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: de-DE In-Reply-To: <6A495D4A.1A88@ix.netcom.com> Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:671374 Am Samstag000004, 04.07.2026 um 21:21 schrieb The Starmaker: > Thomas Heger wrote: >> >> Am Mittwoch000001, 01.07.2026 um 19:33 schrieb Paul B. Andersen: >>> Den 29.06.2026 11:05, skrev Maciej Woźniak: >>>> Well, I'm an engineer. >>> >>> Then you know that "time" is what we measure with clocks. >> >> that's nonsense, since 'is' (in the statement above) means: >> >> the 'thing' we call 'time' would depend on clocks. >> >> But that is absolutely untrue. >> >> That would be equivalent to: >> 'the quantity length' would depend on yardsticks. >> >> Instead: >> we have something that we call 'time', which can be measured with clocks >> (and other devices). But time does not depend on clocks (because clocks >> are man-made device), but is created as a feature of nature. >> >> Our aim is now NOT the measurement of time, but to find out, why and how >> nature is able to maintain this feature >> >> ... >> >> TH > > > 'In the beginning, ...' > > Nature > is able > to maintain > this feature.. > from the very beginning. > > The Sun > The Moon > Not quite: Our solar system is just a little older than a few billion years, while the universe itself about three times older (allegedly). TH