Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Lleyton H. Bellucci" Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Bell's spaceship paradox... Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 15:47:56 +0000 (UTC) Organization: 4HC Foundation Inc Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <4646cce0-edfb-4d2e-b6f8-733ab535cb53@googlegroups.com> <8c613317-d3e7-40e3-aeb6-a1a233e95028@googlegroups.com> <6e7966fd-c7d1-47d8-aa73-28bcc154c156@googlegroups.com> <276dfe21-f830-42fc-ba1e-afb68602f8f7@googlegroups.com> <1795b25f-d3e9-48a4-ab6c-464f4cd5f2cf@googlegroups.com> <8ZudndN8-fgGl3bInZ2dnUU7_82dnZ2d@giganews.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: UHtBHzF8NjoT5Cnehabo1A.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (UNIX) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:363146 Il giorno Sat, 05 Sep 2015 10:30:35 -0500 *_Tom Roberts_* ha scritto: >> They simply use, obey to the convention, nothing more. > > You OBVIOUSLY do not know any physicists. We check our work in as many > ways as possible, and if SR did not provide accurate answers it would > have been abandoned long ago. > > And in some situations is HAS been abandoned -- those which are outside > its domain of applicability. As when those phenomenon can be explained by means of something else apart from SR. > Again, you don't have a clue about how physicists ACTUALLY behave. > Accurate answers are more important than "status", because one could not > achieve any "status" at all without accurate answers. This is not accurate, to the number of decimals necessary. The most of the achievable status are achieved by answers shown to be interpreted wrong later on.