Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2025 09:41:20 +0100
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <modauaFmee2U9@mid.individual.net>
References: <mq2rgkl3a51s5eg5vmu1p6ib5f3q2ig8gd@4ax.com> <37dtgk95rie389qm3sps8beibmq7huudo9@4ax.com> <1rlheo3.n3j6a1zakxatN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <2d5vgk5ue9vsd8et8t06o0l6ebc6ov5bsj@4ax.com> <0020hk5jbrvk617hm69kp32qftbpvi06th@4ax.com> <10eqsmu$3hf75$1@dont-email.me> <1876925df53de7d0$6247443$2551467$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <QqOdqtP4BJFN586lV3bjE5NhTCU@jntp> <1876accc4b7ba45e$6383263$2551467$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <10et7q2$5iu5$1@dont-email.me> <mng6tnFouopU2@mid.individual.net> <10f04fr$vm8o$1@dont-email.me> <mnithlF7reuU4@mid.individual.net> <10f2pn9$1mkfd$1@dont-email.me> <mnlknrFlrnaU4@mid.individual.net> <OkrRQ.3049$IjW2.64@fx18.ams4> <mo04s3Ff2a9U5@mid.individual.net> <r2LSQ.25312$DJ42.21897@fx16.ams4> <mo2vpjFte2qU4@mid.individual.net> <9P4TQ.23782$Uyd1.9573@fx06.ams4> <moatsnFalgeU3@mid.individual.net> <AS2UQ.273$tnG4.95@fx12.ams4>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net dhPvvqloyY+wcPukW3FT3Q30217EMazfj1LKK7KBAyeU52Ksk4
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Y1Hlvjfr8aUrDvR39X5Peg6eZe4= sha256:4R22OdFx1rVua3L1xmkq86p8VJuSHTIHu2gh+6wU404=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <AS2UQ.273$tnG4.95@fx12.ams4>
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:667423

Am Freitag000021, 21.11.2025 um 20:15 schrieb Paul B. Andersen:
> Den 21.11.2025 11:46, skrev Thomas Heger:
>> Am Dienstag000018, 18.11.2025 um 21:39 schrieb Paul B. Andersen:
>>> It is an indisputable fact that SR and GR give precise
>>> predictions for what will be measured in well defined experiments.
> 
>> Again: you are a hopeless case!
>>
>> You HAVE to distinguish between a model and the real world, even if 
>> the model is quite good.
>>
>> This is so, because model and real world 'live' in different domains.
> 
> You are claiming that theories of physics can't make predictions
> of what will be measured in the real world, because a mathematical
> model has nothing to do with the real world.

No, I didn't say that.

Of course models use all kinds of mathematics. But models are, 
nevertheless, different to what they model, .

And even good models are still models (and NOT real).

...

TH