Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Sylvia Else Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: How easy it is to understand relativity is pseudoscience. Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 14:48:52 +1000 Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <6cae9309-49ed-4faf-8360-18826ece5dafn@googlegroups.com> <2d303157-f2c5-4cef-b305-b079a3a269dfn@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net xHH+VyA4ubAPzQIEJ89ICAkY426Uwx7O5MezjgA1GhtHwWHGW/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:NQqt+du3khP1J9o6Udbj12ADmN0= sha256:5pi6pZEyxX0cVRQ8BDwU17giz4Ecn2Up2PtCWLO0cxk= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <2d303157-f2c5-4cef-b305-b079a3a269dfn@googlegroups.com> Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:615501 On 16-July-23 6:00 pm, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > On Sunday, 16 July 2023 at 09:03:33 UTC+2, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 14-July-23 10:59 am, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>> 1. The second postulate asserts light speed is the same regardless of relative motion. Since all motion is relative motion, this is plainly not true. The disproof given by many critics is comparing three inertial reference frames. >> Yes, how amazing that we've waited over a century for a person of your >> genius to spot this issue. I mean, if there were a problem this obvious >> with the theory, you'd think that someone would have spotted it before, >> but apparently not. > > Strange thing, but true - for more than 100 years nobody, neither > worshippers of the relativity nor itheir opponents, noticed how > obviously inconsistent it is. Well, stupidity isn't infinite, Your > insane guru was wrong about it too, but can be amazingly big. > The odd thing is that those who claim it is obviously inconsistent seem completely incapable of explaining how it is obvious, other than by repeatedly asserting that it is. I mean, if something is obvious, how difficult can it be to explain? Sylvia.