Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed.
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 18:14:40 -0500
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <kh8qf4F5o7uU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <54ae5f05-6bc4-4b29-8d84-3e745845deecn@googlegroups.com> <1qdinn5.1y6kixv10la1ohN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <701741a2-c802-4068-b809-180e6e282e5fn@googlegroups.com> <u8brgf$1p0c2$1@dont-email.me> <caeda50c-0d92-407c-8363-ff20c2a72449n@googlegroups.com> <u8eq9f$26bvf$1@dont-email.me> <6df6ac59-ab64-4b6f-b413-af2532a043adn@googlegroups.com> <u8hf3e$2j6j6$1@dont-email.me> <05a84afd-1187-419c-8cf9-3ccb70b8a17fn@googlegroups.com> <kh3jhjF98k3U1@mid.individual.net> <c02c9e7c-3fbe-44d6-b412-e0d83ebada8an@googlegroups.com> <kh4ne5Feu7nU1@mid.individual.net> <dadc44f4-0467-4078-a704-893925be42b5n@googlegroups.com> <6223b5bd-680f-412e-b998-8e65e09b8fb8n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net wSRN6e5e2nEXOaDz1GnT+AyYTp27x0oFl1mn5X69OCym+DDfD0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6wuuRgnlnAQjbXGXz85N+d09HjY= sha256:T5jlVCLZV8NeVkeXvzV3qlRJ4VzHS/8E4NKOfZy2mek=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <6223b5bd-680f-412e-b998-8e65e09b8fb8n@googlegroups.com>
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:615102

On 7/12/2023 5:02 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
<...>

> Here's another corrective for getting a more accurate measure (although the author is a relativist): "Not relying on the Newton gravitational constant gives more accurate
> gravitational predictions" by Espen Gaarder Haug.  The constant was added in early in the 19th century to fine tune it.

You really should stick to your strong suit, the history of
science. You're not much good in discussing its future.