Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed.
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 20:52:06 -0500
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <kh3qu9FaigoU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <fb6f1170-e09c-4fd6-95d0-6a322e5a5459n@googlegroups.com> <54ae5f05-6bc4-4b29-8d84-3e745845deecn@googlegroups.com> <1qdinn5.1y6kixv10la1ohN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <701741a2-c802-4068-b809-180e6e282e5fn@googlegroups.com> <u8brgf$1p0c2$1@dont-email.me> <caeda50c-0d92-407c-8363-ff20c2a72449n@googlegroups.com> <u8eq9f$26bvf$1@dont-email.me> <6df6ac59-ab64-4b6f-b413-af2532a043adn@googlegroups.com> <u8hf3e$2j6j6$1@dont-email.me> <05a84afd-1187-419c-8cf9-3ccb70b8a17fn@googlegroups.com> <kh3jhjF98k3U1@mid.individual.net> <c02c9e7c-3fbe-44d6-b412-e0d83ebada8an@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net 5VyOV7Ozb6+xB3eZWL+brgce9XDOhWDpfFQvdb9N62VGG4SZju
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qSlUyF8J7+OL/LMntRIAKD2gKHo= sha256:VNjtoO9C4NOcyjSi5vlPiK3z6l/e4pXcCgwhb3Px4zQ=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <c02c9e7c-3fbe-44d6-b412-e0d83ebada8an@googlegroups.com>
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:614961

On 7/10/2023 7:43 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 8:45:59 PM UTC-3, whodat wrote:
>> On 7/10/2023 3:39 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
>>> On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 2:28:17 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote:
>>>> On 7/9/2023 4:19 PM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>>> Jan explicitly stated that general relativity was needed for the extreme
>>>>>> accuracy needed for multiple flybys. GR is not Euclidean math.
>>>>>
>>>>> And Jan explicitly lied.
>>>> No, janitor, Jan told the truth. Jan said GR was necessary for precise multiple flybys and GR is non-Euclidean geometry.
>>>
>>>>> Of course your GR is not not Euclidean math, and it's Euclidean math what is used.
>>>
>>>> Except, as Jan stated, GR is used, so Euclidean geometry isn't being used. No matter how much you rave and spit about it,
>>>> Euclidean geometry isn't being used when GR is used. Too bad for you.
>>>
>>>>> Even idiots like JJ are not stupid enough to apply The Shit for real. They only pretend.
>>>> Except it's NASA which is using GR for its flybys, not JJ. JJ is just trying to correct your misunderstandings.
>>>
>>> Who the fuck Jan is? Sagan, Michio Kaku or Neil DeGrasse ?
>>>
>>> He's a self-entitled NOBODY, and you're an ass-kisser, as it comes to your personality and tastes (you know).
>> <...>
>>
>> Self-entitled appears to me to be the hallmark of most
>> Usenet newsgroups. Just how many kinds of "entitled"
>> are there? Is there any formal recognition for being
>> entitled?
> 
> I asked Jan, politely, to tell which are his credentials and in what fields did he developed his career. He didn't answer, which
> is not playing in his favor. You told some bits of information, and Roberts did provide a detailed list, as well others like Paul,
> JanPB, or Volney, etc.
> 
> What is he afraid of? Of being a Bodkin' clone, who developed his  career HERE, since 2014 + one book/week?
> 
> I think he's an opinionated charlatan.

There's always a reason. The questions I asked do have
validity outside the thorough description above.