Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed.
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2023 14:25:29 -0500
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <kh0ftaFofuaU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <fb6f1170-e09c-4fd6-95d0-6a322e5a5459n@googlegroups.com> <54ae5f05-6bc4-4b29-8d84-3e745845deecn@googlegroups.com> <1qdinn5.1y6kixv10la1ohN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <f05b41df-1213-4c57-9087-1b8cb62a2858n@googlegroups.com> <37e488e1-ce49-4202-b273-1e527166b4a0n@googlegroups.com> <3181b538-9b13-47f1-b0ca-43727377a0d2n@googlegroups.com> <b8fb5536-b033-4ee6-8527-b7ea47738e5an@googlegroups.com> <b4da6bb2-dd5b-4049-9ef6-20cb3bf5b4f5n@googlegroups.com> <a03f43d5-d1da-4bcd-823e-f9e481913322n@googlegroups.com> <fa588482-ab27-4f7f-8082-0f13397e20cbn@googlegroups.com> <9c1e4912-d427-4de2-8739-3504b85cf46en@googlegroups.com> <1beb2f27-8617-46f9-ac28-ba204791845bn@googlegroups.com> <u8et6n$26jmp$2@dont-email.me> <6a9f4988-2b53-4344-bfb9-5294b2aabb4en@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net YCX7b1hO0vaEHRrCQMRaNAX01jkH9PYPyI8bCpyqyijeDPj1OW
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lg+wYiqm/S4zDQ1ARQ8CBLV+SDU= sha256:3FZGBhnl1jgA9ZRJhoG4ruflqFBnjKHuRFsVsjHzlyM=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <6a9f4988-2b53-4344-bfb9-5294b2aabb4en@googlegroups.com>
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:614862

On 7/9/2023 1:16 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
> On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 11:10:35 AM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
>> On 7/9/2023 2:01 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
>>> On Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 2:20:50 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
>>
>>>> I must have missed the part where you provided evidence to support your claims... could you run that evidence by me again?

>>> The relativists here are not at all persuasive. They would need to study the critics for one thing.

>> It is the "critics" (crackpots) who are not at all persuasive. Because
>> they don't have any evidence of their claims!

> "I can also define science another way: Science is the belief
> in the ignorance of experts.” That makes me a scientist not you.

<BURP>