Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: whodat Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: If relativity was easy to understand Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 19:41:12 -0500 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net Yf7qiuZlMvLeYlWsxu6g/QBLYyWj0qu+uB5wRIHGo+m4Ur3XNf Cancel-Lock: sha1:SXXM5xd7jmGE2kDoTCXSR2Nz/Ek= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:614416 On 7/3/2023 4:51 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 6:42:00 PM UTC-3, whodat wrote: >> If relativity was easy to understand we probably wouldn't have cranks. > > If any kind of relativity didn't come into existence, we still would have cranks, because the human nature is to question things. > > Also, you don't know shit about history of science for the last 300 years. Your mind have stuck with 20/30 figures, and that's all. > > You need to read DETAILED BOOKS about the history of physics and astronomy since the XVIII century, and gain knowledge > about THOUSANDS of contributors in the scientific development, either being them right or wrong. > > You are TOO SIMPLE for a consultant (RE). Up is up, down is down. Black is black, white is white.