Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: whodat Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: How do you tell who's telling the truth? Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2023 14:39:27 -0500 Lines: 49 Message-ID: References: <0a865ed3-cd27-417b-a101-d3e45959cb32n@googlegroups.com> <70b9c598-2a24-4aec-937b-a3bd853c3795n@googlegroups.com> <1fffb466-c922-44fd-929b-4a85d8595dcen@googlegroups.com> <0432a2cb-c989-4e95-87ff-542e34a85d20n@googlegroups.com> <6dca412b-af24-450f-b213-8e2dce401b7fn@googlegroups.com> <9090a90d-e687-4697-8521-190321eed78en@googlegroups.com> <728f2afc-fb9b-45c8-a9bd-ca512003c7c2n@googlegroups.com> <1f4e8c7c-f631-4bd9-9c58-6cd344491173n@googlegroups.com> <9ce5b516-483e-477a-84ec-0abe970fc8d0n@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net 7xFyejxIBksxXFcsoZU7iA48lr0+AyOJXYPFeunVcVau6aajkn Cancel-Lock: sha1:kygbb9P9/AzMTQk7xpUPL6L42MQ= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <9ce5b516-483e-477a-84ec-0abe970fc8d0n@googlegroups.com> Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:614218 On 7/1/2023 1:40 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 11:11:26 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >> On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 2:24:26 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>> On 6/30/2023 10:55 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>>> On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 8:52:08 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>> >>>>> He (or she) who lays a claim is required to defend it. Failure to defend >>>>> is admission of falseness. >>> >>>> You never listen so you never learn. You don't qualify for a debate, so you can't make demands. This is a discussion forum not a debate. >>> Although it appears that English is your first language you've made it >>> clear on more than one occasion that you have poor mastery of it. >>> >>> "Britannica Dictionary definition of DEBATE >>> >>> ": a discussion between people in which they express different opinions >>> about something >>> >>> "◊ A debate can be an organized event, an informal discussion between >>> two or more people, or a general discussion that involves many people." >>> >>> >>> >>> Secondly, as this forum can be and is the basis for this "debate" >>> thus the only qualification is participation. You are out of order in >>> so many ways it boggles the mind. You cannot impose rules that >>> weren't extant before you chose to participate. When you chose >>> to participate you accepted the charter that created this >>> newsgroup. If you demand a different set of rules, petition >>> for and start a different newsgroup. Otherwise live with what's >>> already here. > >> You know you are a very painstaking kind of guy. You don't realize how easy it is to refute relativity. It's not a science. It is really an ideology. Elementary logic and science are sufficient. I recommend you read "A Big Howler- Einstein's Theory of Relativity" by Dr. Paul S. Gulati. I'm reading it right now. > > https://www.amazon.co.uk/Big-Howler-Einsteins-Special-Relativity/dp/B0006EEVHI > > A 92-page book written in 1982 with zero reviews by a guy with zero presence on the internet. It must be really riveting! Sorry Paul, AFAIC you're not coming from a good place. It has to start somewhere. BTW, how does an average nobody become a somebody? I won't criticize because then for the sake of legitimacy I'd have to read and understand his work. As matters stand, others will do that for me and report. So far, one in favor of, anybody have reason to dispute that? I'll be happy to hear from anyone who read this work. I'll listen to any report that finds either way.